<span>During World War I, most attacks in no-man’s-land led to death, no tangible territorial gains and mass suffering on both sides </span>
Answer:
It can be viewed in opposite opinions, so I'll do both, and you can choose which one you use- you could use both, which would detail your answer more, and ensure you get top marks.
Explanation:
On one hand, I disagree that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany. After majorly contributing to the start of World War I, causing mass destruction to numerous countries, they deserved a severe punishment to face their consequences, which included reparations, loss of their territory, and regulations on the size of their army. It was right for them to be punished so harshly, so they could learn not to cross the Allies again.
On the other hand, I agree that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany. Despite contributing to a war, every country was involved, so it is not right Germany are the ones getting severely punished. The punishments are too harsh and majorly damaged the country's economy, and I feel this is too hard on Germany.
Hope this helps!
Answer: Hitler was a great speaker, with the power to make people support him. The moderate political parties would not work together, although together they had more support than the Nazis.The depression of 1929 created poverty and unemployment, which made people angry with the Weimar government. People lost confidence in the democratic system and turned towards the extremist political parties such as the Communists and Nazis during the depression.
Explanation: hope this helps!
