When we did the intervention we also set ourselves up for disaster due to putting a border on Mexico making it more attractive to come illegally thru America and we deport alot of them what's hypocritical about that is if we had not put a border and not Intervened into Mexicos business, America and Mexico would have hashed out a proper plan and have made the legal idea of moving to America the only reason to go there.
Answer:
by Great Britain, and the Negro slave trade, Negro slavery and ... of the Industrial Revolution has been treated more or less ade- ... class in general and of those people in particular: who are re- ... it has left even upon the civilization of today have not any- ... it is not adopted as the choice over free labor; there is no choice.
yearly imports of Negroes were not large, the importation combined ... status did not result in any large-scale importation, and it was not until 1753 that the foreign trade in slaves became very large. In 1790 ... in 1850 and 1860 than they were in earlier years. ... fifties it is fairly certain that no slave holders but those few whose.
Explanation:
This is an interesting question, but it supposes nations like Asia or Africa wouldn’t venture off to the Americas themselves (in which many native Americans have connections to Africans). If your question about another way to reach India not going west, then they’d go East, by land. I believe it was just to make it faster to travel by sea though and for more resources. Natives and Africans didn’t colonize (from my research) and if they did it wasn’t nearly as impactful or as cruel as Europeans had done.
Answer:
Slaves mightve entered the union army or run away from working for the south to produce for the souths war efforts. Dont remember much history but i think that was the vague idea.
Explanation:
