1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
3 years ago
12

briefly explain one important difference between the economies of british colonies in the South and New England by 1750.

History
1 answer:
Bond [772]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Basically, there were two great differences between the New England colonies and the southern colonies.

On the one hand, economic production: the New England colonies were the only ones that had a certain degree of industrialization and produced manufactures and ships, in addition to the traditional agricultural production of the area. In contrast, the southern colonies focused almost exclusively on tobacco and cotton production, as well as agricultural products.

On the other, the social composition: the New England colonies had a much smaller proportion of the slave population than the southern colonies, which, given the purely rural type of production they had, needed a large amount of labor to carry out their productive processes.

You might be interested in
Why were'nt Spartans allowed to trade or travel
gregori [183]
The Spartans were not allowed to trade or travel because they can not risk a war or battle to start on foreign ground.
5 0
4 years ago
On the map above country number one is
Elina [12.6K]
The answer is: Pakistan
3 0
3 years ago
The 2nd Continental Congress declared independence from Great Britain, but
kifflom [539]

Answer:

they still needed to go to war to fight?

Explanation:

im so sorry if this is wrong

5 0
3 years ago
How did Britain “rule” India? What methods did they use to control India? Did they rule directly, or indirectly (hands on, or ha
Tema [17]

Answer:

i can answer number 1,\

Control of India was given to a British Governor-General, who reported back to the British Parliament. It should be noted that the British Raj included only about two-thirds of modern India, with the other portions under the control of local princes. However, Britain exerted great pressure on these princes, effectively controlling all of India.

HOPE THIS HELPED !!

 <3    kaylee

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What do seals and weights suggest about Harappa and Mohenjo-daro
nikklg [1K]

Seals were used to make a sealing, or positive imprint, like this modern resin one made from the original seal. Sealings were ... They would be made on ceramics or the clay tags used to seal the rope around bundles of goods. ... Mohenjo-daro.

Hope it helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are secondary sources often useful?
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main cause and consquance of ww2?
    12·1 answer
  • What is “the unfinished work” or “great task remaining before” his audience, the American people?
    6·1 answer
  • Kells were at the mainland oft
    12·1 answer
  • What might convince an investor to buy stock or mutual funds?
    11·1 answer
  • Which best explains why Britain restricted trade with the colonies?
    11·2 answers
  • 4. What was the significance of the Battle of Britain?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT a purpose of the propaganda campaign?
    15·2 answers
  • The Huang He is also called the __________ River.
    12·2 answers
  • Marbury vs Madison established the power of “judicial review” for the supreme court. what are the 3 principles of power?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!