1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yawa3891 [41]
3 years ago
15

Using four or more complete sentences, describe the structure and features of monarchies in the Middle East.

History
1 answer:
Zigmanuir [339]3 years ago
8 0
Monarchies in the Middle East are ruled by one supreme ruler, usually a king, a sultan, or an emir. In some countries, this ruler has absolute power, meaning that he has the final say on all government decisions and answers to no one. His powers are not confined by a constitution. Other monarchies have constitutions that limit the ruler's power. In these countries, the ruler shares power with other government officials, such as a prime minister and a cabinet. This allows for a greater balance of power in a monarchy. Tribal law is a prevalent legal system in Middle Eastern monarchies, highlighting the role of the family in government. Monarchies are often controlled by a royal family, who fill most government positions. Top positions are hereditary, meaning that they are passed down through families.
You might be interested in
Discuss the similarities and differences between George W. Bush and Al Gore
Arte-miy333 [17]

So, Bush believed that all military missions should be based on U.S. strategic interests and should have clear objectives and exit strategies. He does not want to over commit the armed forces and would like to see allies shoulder more responsibility in terms of regional conflicts. Bush believes that U.S. regional priorities consist of Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and the Far East, and he strongly supports maintaining U.S. presence in NATO. He feels that the U.S. should be prepared for military intervention if necessary, but that a strong military will act as a deterrent to security threats.

Gore assailed Bush's proposal to withdraw U.S. forces from the Balkans saying it would be "a damaging blow to NATO" and would jeopardize other U.S. alliances. He has defined six criteria for deciding whether to deploy the military: (1) Is the mission in U.S. national interests? (2) Is military force the only way to solve the conflict? (3) Have all other options been exhausted? (4) Will force solve the problem? (5) Do we have the support of allies? (6) Is the cost of the operation proportionate to the objective? Gore's policy of "forward engagement" calls for early diplomatic intervention to prevent the need for future military deployment.

:)

4 0
3 years ago
What was the goal of Monroe's u.s. foreign policy the Monroe Doctrine
torisob [31]
The goal was to tell the rest of the world (mainly the Europeans) that the United States has official borders and that they could no longer colonize in the borders.
It also told the Europeans that the U.S would not interfere with their colonies or Europe itself.
7 0
3 years ago
Why do the power and popularity of political parties change over time?
Rina8888 [55]

Political parties are legally formed groups oriented to occupy political power. The power of each party is related to the number of elected candidates it possesses. Just as popularity is associated with the number of voters the party can muster. Power and popularity change over time according to their trajectories. The way parties are aligned with their electoral principles and commitments.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Green Corn Rebellion began as an effort to protest against
VladimirAG [237]
I'm pretty sure it's c that's what i'm getting it says farmers and other were going to march across the country and eat green corn for food is where the name came from but they attempted to enforced the drafts
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write an editorial . The editorial must reflect your opinion about The Boston Massacre.
sdas [7]
First you have to understand what happened in March 5, 1770 a British soldier got in an argument with a colonist then the soldier struck him, people started to gather and then yell at the soldier call him names and then they started taunting him then other soldiers started shotting people in the crowd instantly 3 people died including a salior Crispus Attucks then two days later 2 more people die. My opinion on the topic is it was sad and tragic that it was all because of an argument that got five people shot and killed.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is the wolrd created by god
    14·1 answer
  • How did the make-up of the Roman Senate change over time?
    15·1 answer
  • The Articles of Confederation reflected the principle of "limited government" because it gave more power to the federal governme
    5·1 answer
  • 21) Many people around the world agreed with the formation of the state of Israel because of the events associated with A) D-Day
    6·1 answer
  • The spread of Christianity to 325 CE was mainly due to:
    15·1 answer
  • A person who strongly believes in communism would most strongly agree with which statement?
    12·2 answers
  • 6. The Constitution granted different responsibilities to each branch of government.
    12·1 answer
  • In a paragraph, explain why this amendment was proposed and what effects it had
    12·1 answer
  • How many miles between hangzhou and the himalayan mountains
    14·1 answer
  • What events characterize the Revolution and Republic era in Texas history?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!