The effect on the reader by knowing the true background of the photo is shown by thees two statements- Firstly ,It makes the reader consider the idea that the media doesn’t always tell the true story (A),Secondly (C) It shows the reader that when it comes to persuasive media, you can’t always trust what you see.
Explanation:
The effect on the reader after discovering the true background of the picture is stated by the below mentioned statements:-
- <u>It makes the reader consider the idea that the media doesn’t always tell the true story</u>-It means that the media creates a hype of small things ,rather than communicating the true story it simply exaggerate the story and presents it in front of its viewers
- <u> It shows the reader that when it comes to persuasive media, you can’t always trust what you see</u>-As mentioned in the earlier statement that the media tries to show people what they want to see in a manipulative way,the true story is always hidden or manipulated in the way media wants to portray it in front of the people.
Answer:
Here are some ideas
Explanation:
For this type of work, keep in mind it isn't a choice that will affect you in any way. Here are some points for each side of the debate:
DISAGREE
- Citizens should have a right to privacy.
- Secretive government actions can result in trust in our society to weaken.
- If spying through technology such as webcams, the wrong person could gain access.
AGREE
- Spying on citizens planning on committing a crime through phone calls could lead to preventing a robbery, murder, or even a terrorist attack.
- The safety of thousands of people could be kept by simply overhearing a conversation.
I really hoped this helps, we,ve all been there
