Put a picture of the article so i can help :). i cant know what this article is about with just the question.
Answer:
The Rule gave monasteries order and discipline.
Explanation:
It remains to be one of the most significant examples of a program sponsored by the government. ... This type of system reinforces tariff to protect and promote American industry, national bank to nurture commerce, and state subsidies to promote the improvement of roads, canals, and etc.
This was because mules were the driving force behind it, meaning they pulled boats and mine cars. They also helped drive the coal industry to success, being chosen over horses because of their strength.
<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.