The statement given in the question is (A) True.
Transactional leadership is defined as a leadership style that emphasizes rewards and punishments on behaviors that the followers exhibit. This style of leadership seeks to maintain the status quo.
Its contrast is <em>transformational leadership</em>, where the leader works with teams to problem-solve and bring a vision into reality by directly involving themselves.
Since dale has admitted that he has used it for his own gas, Dale should henceforth has to options.He has to either see whether that is according to his salary package, If it is a miscellaneous expenses it is rather too high for Dale to use that $450. He should track in fuel cost of Dale report it on a daily basis. He should always at the end of the day check his income and expenses.
Explanation:
- Sue needs to check his income expenses on a daily basis.
- He should confront Dale henceforth not use cash for personal use.
- He should collect the money Dale should show the receipt to Sue.
- He should let sue control the money.
- It has a deficit because, He did not manage to keep the money align.
- Dale used for personal expenses totally against the business loss.
Answer:
The correct option is D, outcome-based ethics.
Explanation:
Duty-based ethics preaches the idea that one should be seen doing the right thing at all times regardless of the consequences of one's actions, it is unlike the utilitarian approach to ethics where what is wrong or right is a function of having the greatest good for the greatest number of people not minding whether the approach used is wrong or right.
Corporate social responsibility involves the additional efforts put in by corporations in a bid to give back to society.
Religious ethical principles is about concluding on right or wrong using the lenses of religion.
Outcome-based ethics is a sharp contrast to duty-based ethics, as the outcome or consequence is what justifies the moral right or wrong. in other words the end justifies the means.
Answer:
The amount that would be reported as receivables from affiliates is $0.
Explanation:
Here Mr and Mrs Dart owns a majority of shares of Wall corp, Black co, and West inc. In 2010 , wall made advanced cash to black($50,000) and west($80,000) and also west made advance to black($70,000).
While preparing the combined balance sheet for all these company's , any amount of account receivables will not be included because preparing a combined balance sheet is same as making consolidated balance sheet , were any inter company profit or losses , account receivables and payable are not included in the balance sheet , so therefore the amount that would be reported as receivables from affiliates is $0.
