Answer:
In the story "Rules of the game" by Tiger and Rose has five main elements of structure which are:
exposition, rising action. climax, falling action and resolution. i will be explaining the five elements below:
Explanation:
The Exposition: The exposition of the story is when we learn that Waverly Jong (the narrator), lives in Chinatown. and how she relates with her family. When she says " we lived in a place, in a warm, clean, two bedroom flat that sat above a small Chinese bakery specializing in steamed pastries and dim sum"
The climax of the story is when Waverly ran away from home when her mother was taking pride in her. This is the climax because it is the turning point of the story. here is the height of tension where the reader wonders wether Waverly can survive on her own.
The rising action of the story is when Waverly returns home and her mother used the silence treatment on her.
The falling action of the story is when waverly was running and find out that she could not live independently nor completely avoid her family. she said "I ran until it hurt and i realized i had nowhere to go, that i was not running from anything."
The resolution is when she said "I closed my eyes and wondered my next move."
B is the correct answer because the king want's answers to how he should he handle the problem because the king could always handle any problem his people gave him but that one question he couldn't answer so his people (knights magicians) told him to seek out to the hermit for the hermits wisdom.
That is why B is your answer. I hope this helped you sir.
I don't know if there are any options, but my first guess would be - image. In his early imagist phase, Pound wanted to get rid of abstractions that were nearly the sole focus of the 19th-century romantic poetry. Instead, he aimed for pure visual images as signifiers of the world around us. He preferred simplicity as opposed to complex philosophical concepts. For example, instead of writing about nature as a source of spiritual nourishment (such as the romantic would have done), he wrote a 2-line, free-verse poem about people who are standing in the station of a metro, waiting for their train to arrive, and resembling "petals on a long, wet bough". The whole poem is an image, absolutely devoid of abstractions.
As you know, this story reveals the problem of men's attitude towards women, especially this conflict shapes in relationships between husbands and their wives. So, at those times only a few men took women serious, mostly they were neglectful to women and didn't treat them like they were on a par. Even though you didn't give any options, I have got the answer and do hope it will help you: The shattered fruit jar symbolizes the broken and unhappy home in which Mrs. Wright lived.
The way Holmes handles the perpetrators of the crimes affect how I view Holmes in a significant way: these examples show that, even with all the characteristics that put Holmes one step ahead of most human being, he is somehow still human, human enough to do something that is not considered right for many, but for him it is. It showed me that Holmes has an integrity I never considered before.
----
For me, it is, as it proves his integrity and also the dedication to his work. He does not want to punish the guilty, instead what really concerns Holmes is the discovery of the truth. In that sense, his mission is admirable.
----
Yes, it is possible to say that he sees himself as “above the law”. Holmes does not care for trivial human conventions, as he displayed on many occasions throughout his career. He believes that his ability and talent are enough to put him above the law.
----
It depends on what it is considered ethical. From his point of view, surely it is ethical. From the point of view of the justice system, it is surely not ethical. From a personal perspective, while I do understand his point of view, I do not consider his behavior ethical.
----
<span>I do consider his behavior ethical because, while he has many talents and abilities, no man should be seen himself as above the law. It takes only one man to consider himself as so to justify every other man to do the same, and so this would led to many men thinking they could do justice on their own. </span>
