You need to post the evidence examples...
I watched a movie yesterday.
Answer:
I would like both of them to be as friendly
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>These passages differ in their ideas about the Magnusson fishery and conservation act in the sense that the first author warns that the act is insufficient, while the second author argues that it may be too strict. (D)</em>
<em />
<u>Explanation:</u>
Both the authors have given different perspectives and shared distinct opinions on the Magnusson act. There are different facts and figures which have been put forward by both the writers supporting respective opinions. The later considers this act and its regulations may affect fisheries and its overall supply while the former considers this act as an insufficient one.
