The answer will be no, because you must know how to solve for no to find his moms
The Voting Rights Act of 1965, was signed into law by President Lyndon B.
This act changed into signed into law on August 6, 1965, by using President Lyndon Johnson. It outlawed the discriminatory voting practices adopted in lots of southern states after the Civil warfare, along with literacy exams as a prerequisite to voting.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 hastened the cease of legal Jim Crow. It secured African individuals identical get entry to restaurants, transportation, and other public facilities. It enabled blacks, ladies, and other minorities to interrupt obstacles inside the place their job.
On August 6, 1965, President Lyndon Johnson came to the Capitol to sign the voting Rights Act. Following a rite in the Rotunda, the president, congressional leaders, Martin Luther King, Jr., Rosa Parks, and others crowded into the President's Room close to the Senate Chamber for the real signing.
Learn more about President Lyndon Johnson here: brainly.com/question/16425692
#SPJ4
Answer:
Steal the land of the natives and claimed he had "found it". But all he really did was despoil native americans property and life.
Just another expedition of a white man call. He couldnt even know the difference between Japan and China
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
