Answer:
the money multiplier = 1/ reserve ratio in this case, the reserve ratio is 10% (required) + 10% (voluntary) = 20%, so the money multiplier = 1/20% = 5 %
What is the immediate impact of this transaction on the money supply? None, since the money supply doesn't change. When a customer deposits money in a bank, the money does not increase, only its composition changes. The maximum amount by which this bank will increase its loans from the transaction in part (a) • the bank will be able to loan = total deposit x (1 - reserve ratio) = $9,000
x (1 - 20%) = $7,200
The maximum increase in the money supply that will be generated from the transaction in part
• since the banks started to "create" money by lending the money, the money supply will increase by total deposit x ( money multiplier - 1) = $9,000 x 4 = $36,000 Assume that the government increases spending by $9,000, which is financed by a sale of bonds to the central bank. Indicate what will happen to the money supply.
• The money supply will increase.
Explain what will happen to the money demand. • The money demand will also increase because aggregate demand and income will increase. Aggregate demand will increase by $9,000 x government multiplier. The government multiplier = 1/ MPS.
Answer:
The contact and relationship between the two always seemed to go back and forth from a peaceful relationship to one with hostility. However complex their relationship was, Egypt and Nubia both developed through political, economic, and cultural means depending on who held power at the time
Explanation: please give brainliest
Answer:
Not sure what you need to include in your answer but i will give my opinion.
Explanation:
In my opinion congressional members should be elected based on the popular vote, if a member is more popular and prefered than another member then they should be the one elected.
For example in the presidental election there is a system called electorial college, bigger states have bigger numbers to win. In the election they must have 170 points to win. This is an unfair advantage because if a canadidate has only had a small percentage more votes than the other popular canadidate then that's unfair and the canadidate who is not popular gets ahead even by a small margin of votes.
I'm assuming this is opinion based but hope it helps.
