1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tester [92]
3 years ago
9

6. “The words and actions of Jesus at the last supper are the most important for Christians to follow” Evaluate this statement (

12) In your answer you should: • give developed arguments to support this statement • give developed arguments to support a different point of view • refer to St Mark’s gospel • reach a justified conclusion. (Need this answered asap for gcse's) 30 points and first to answer gets brainliest
English
1 answer:
Marizza181 [45]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

“The words and actions of Jesus at the last supper are the most important for Christians to follow”

1. Support of this statement:

The Last Supper words of Jesus Christ imply a command for the disciples of Jesus (Christians) to always gather in thanksgiving to God (Eucharist) to share a meal (Holy Communion), in remembrance of his death (breaking of bread and pouring of blood) on the Cross of Calvary.  It was at the Last Supper that Jesus initiated the events that would culminate in the achievement of his mission.  His mission was to reconcile humanity to the creator, God the Father.  To achieve this reconciliation, it was ordained that he would suffer and die.  That is why before dying, he symbolically broke the bread and poured the wine in the chalice (cup).  Effectively, even in the ordinary events of life, nothing is achieved without some breaking.  For instance, to get food for eating, man breaks the soil.  To become an intellectual giant, you first break your brain in order to increase its power.  For a human to be born, the woman undergoes some breaking of her body both at the conception stage and the delivery state.  It was at the breaking of bread that the two disciples on their way to Emmaus recognized Jesus.   So, there is always an outcome from breaking.  At the Last Supper, Jesus initiated a symbolic act, which he intended his followers to follow as supported by the practise of early Christians, who clearly understood the meaning and impact of his words.

2. Support of a different point of view:

A different view of the Last Supper words and actions of Jesus is that Jesus was simply sharing a meal with his disciples during the Jewish passover.  It was during that meal that he predicted what he was about to accomplish by dying on the cross.  He did not intend that his followers must repeat his words or actions.  He only did the things he did and said the things he said as in a farewell celebration, which he did not intend his followers to judicious follow or continue until the meal in the kingdom of God is celebrated.

3. Reference to St. Mark's Gospel: A review of Mark 14: 22 - 25  while literally supporting the second point of view, may not similarly support the first point of view.  But, this first point of view should not be observed in isolation.  In 1 Corinthians 11: 22 - 26, clearer instructions were revealed to St. Paul on what should actually be the response of Christians to the Last Supper words and actions.

4. Conclusion: Are the two positions above justified by reference to the gospel of Mark 14: 22 - 25 alone?  No. In 1 Corinthians 11: 23 - 26, St. Paul stated that the instruction he received from the Lord Jesus was that we should "do this in memory of me," 1 Corinthians 11:24B and 25B.  He further stated in verse 26, "This means that every time you eat this bread and drink from this cup you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes."  Therefore, my conclusion is that the Lord Jesus did and spoke symbolic words at the Last Supper.  It was not his intention, however, that the event would just pass by without being re-inaugurated.  He wanted his followers to continue to renew the breaking of bread and drinking from the chalice as a memorial of his death.  It is only in these actions that his followers can perpetuate the memory of what he achieved on the Cross of Calvary and also participate in his death and resurrection.  Without this participation, Christians will not have life in them.

Explanation:

1) Mark 14: 22 - 25 says "While they were eating, he took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to them, and said, “Take; this is my body.”  Then he took a cup, and after giving thanks he gave it to them, and all of them drank from it.  He said to them, “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many.  Truly I tell you, I will never again drink of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God.”

2) The Last Supper was the meal that Jesus celebrated with his disciples on the night before his crucifixion.  It was celebrated at an Upper Room in Jerusalem in the year AD 33.  Some Christians refer to this meal as the Lord's Supper.  Some strongly believe and practise that Jesus instituted the Sacrament (outward sign of an inward grace) of his body and blood during the meal.

You might be interested in
I have 4 questions. COMMONLIT: "DIRTY AIR CAN HARM YOUR BRAIN AND STRESS THE BODY"
tamaranim1 [39]

The central idea of the text is found right in its subject or topic. It states that unclean air can harm the brain and stress the body.

<h3>Which detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A above?</h3>

The section or detail from the text that supports the answer above is:

"A 2016 study reported that breathing dirty air is now the fourth leading cause of deaths worldwide".

<h3>Which of the following describes the author's main purpose in the text?</h3>

The purpose of the text is to show and educate the readers on the dangers that air pollution poses to humanity.

<h3>How does the author's reference to the Great Smog contribute to the development of ideas in the text (Paragraphs 1-2)?</h3>

Paragraphs 1 and 2 contain facts and statistics that buttress the author's claim.

For example, in paragraph 2, it is stated that:

"Inhaling the blackened air sent 150,000 persons to the hospital with breathing problems."

Learn more about central ideas at:
brainly.com/question/25307761

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Select the correct text in the passage.
mafiozo [28]

The line demonstrating the use of an understatement is the following:

<em><u>BOB (still looking out—looks up): Still all right up above, though. </u></em>

Having read the previous lines, the reader gets the sense that the situation is critical, the water is rising and it has already flooded the whole lower part of the hotel. However, Bob wants to diminish the emergency of the situation by stating that the upper part still looks alright meaning that the extent of the damage is not as great as Ed says.

8 0
3 years ago
What can you conclude about Martin and his sister by the way they greet Grandpa?
Mila [183]
They talk it out that what happen
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write the word react in conjunction but sentence ​
IgorC [24]

Answer:

??

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is the central idea of "the importance of winning"? Provide two pieces of evidence to support your response.
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

The central idea of the text is that there are situations in which winning is the most important thing, as well as how this victory was achieved.

Explanation:

"The importance of Winning" is a text that highlights how the sense of winning and losing is relative and variable in several different situations. In this text, we can see that the author states that we are taught, since we were children, that winning is not the most important situation in our lives, what matters is that we participate and have fun in a situation. This can be true in school competitions, or playing with our friends. However, there are situations in which winning is very important and the way you win is essential. An example of this, can be seen in politics and for that, the text addresses the presidential election of France where one of the candidates was an ultra nationalist who wanted to expel all immigrants from France, while the other candidate was a conservative politician more tolerant of immigration and cooperation with other countries. This was a case in which winning was of extreme importance for both candidates and migrants.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which excerpts from the passage provide strong evidence that Hrothgar’s hall is famous throughout the lands? Check all that appl
    11·2 answers
  • How do writers of epics typically start their poems?
    7·2 answers
  • what phrase best defines dialect 1. the set of slang terms in a language 2.a manner of conversation that contains no idioms 3. r
    10·2 answers
  • To check an object's authenticity is to find out whether it is
    14·2 answers
  • Write a story where someone is in a situation where they can save themselves selfishly or help others. Survival story.
    5·1 answer
  • What is adjective of careful​
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the story’s resolution sweat
    13·1 answer
  • Read the story
    12·1 answer
  • Write an informative essay about the book/movie Wonder
    7·1 answer
  • 10 verbos irregulares en presente
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!