I am pretty sure that it is the second one. Hope I helped
Answer:
Well doing a potcast is more private, you cant talk on your own way, and is more informal and you can give your opinion, in another hand a docmentary is more searching mor deep, is formal, and you cant say your opinion about it.
Disaventages about potcast: As I said is more informal so most of the people would not like it
Disaventages about documentary: Usually is boring coause it has a lot of information
Explanation:
The answer is D: The moon’s surface reflects sunlight.
The moon is Earth´s natural satellite. It is an astronomical body that orbits the Earth in a synchronous rotation with it (that is why we can only see, from Earth, one of its sides, the other being the dark side of the moon). Since the moon, unlike the sun which is a star that produces energy and is, therefore, a light source, it does not shine through its own light, rather it can only reflect upon its surface the sun´s light allowing us to see it with our bare eyes from the Earth.
They symbolize hope within the novel. When Tom Robinson is on trial and is eventually killed, the children experience a loss of innocence which is later followed by a period of recovery, similar to that of the camellias. At first, Jem is extremely distraught by Robinson's death, thinking that the court would treat all men equal, but the children do not let that event make them think all of the world is evil and prejudiced and eventually heal, knowing that there will be evil in the world yet they can be the good in it. Jem, who is older than Scout, experiences a regrowing after Robinson's death which is juxtaposed against the camellias he destroyed earlier in the book. I hope my explanation helps! ^u^
Answer:
The main idea of each passage:
Explanation:
1. How much drgaons fascinate and interest the main character.
2. That many researches and scientist are against the idea of dragons exsisting
3. How the main character determinedly continued to pursue research with different cultures.
4. Explains how dragons could have been able to have the powers that are sterotypically described.
5. How we will never know which side of the argument is true.
Hope this helped! :)
