Answer: Yes
Explanation: Long ago, almost the whole surface of the earth was one giant landmass called Pangea which was surrounded entirely by water. Then, huge things under the surface called plates started to shift and move which made Pangea break up and drift apart very slowly. Now, we have oceans between the pieces of land
It was beneficial to settlers because they got all this new land to settle on and harmful because they were being made to walk and were being killed on the way there and they were confined to small areas.... hope this helps
Answer:
it fell because of:
Lack of Unity
Some of these satrapies hated being part of the empire (e.g. Egypt welcomed Alexander as their liberator from the Persian Empire), and all of them were inclined to rebel when the Emperor was weak or in difficulty.The Persian Empire entered a period of decline after a failed invasion of Greece by Xerxes I in 480 BC. The costly defense of Persia's lands depleted the empire's funds, leading to heavier taxation among Persia's subjects.
Explanation:
hope i helped
Answer:
I am a child of the eighties, a child of parents of the sixties. They were both liberals and brought me up to be a liberal who believed everyone was equal. I was brought up on the music of Pete Seeger, Tom Paxton and a bunch of others it was part of the music of my childhood and it formed a good part of my political ideology.
And if I were to travel back to the 50s now, you can imagine how I would react to segregation utter abhorrence and disgust and protesting against it as much as possible.
An 1896 Supreme Court decision, Plessy v. Ferguson, had declared “separate but equal” Jim Crow segregation legal. The Plessy ruling asserted that so long as purportedly “equal” accommodations were supplied for African Americans, the races could, legally, be separated. In consequence, “colored” and “whites only” signs proliferated across the South at facilities such as water fountains, restrooms, bus waiting areas, movie theaters, swimming pools, and public schools.
Explanation:
Which statement best explains the changes that have led to the rise of the two-party system?
I hope it helps, Regards.
