Answer:
The Acquiantance is the one at fault in the issue not the attorney in the deceased case(estate)
Explanation: The attorney advised the acquaintance that the attorney did not have experience and was too busy to do the work necessary to become competent. The attorney offered to refer acquaintance to another lawyer who regularly practiced in the field and advised the acquaintance that he should see another lawyer promptly because there might be deadlines he should follow as the executor. The acquaintance did not contact another lawyer until eight months after meeting with the attorney. So the attorney is not subject to any civil liability.
The given statement is false.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Objections raised by the customer side are generally based on the price of the product, old-fashioned brush-offs, competitor products or product fits. It is customary to object the products in the market by the buyers.
Objections may be classified into four types namely,
- Price of the product
- Relationship/Trust
- Quality of service
- Customary stall
From the statement given in the question we can interpret that the customer has lost the trust on the after sales services of the copier. Therefore, we can conclude that the statement is an example of objection due to quality of service.
Answer:
A beer and marijuana are complementary goods
Explanation:
Based on the relationship described in the given statement it can be suggest that beer and marijuana are complementary goods. This is because of the fact that when the price of one item (beer) is increased due to taxation then this means that its demand might decrease due to higher prices now. But this decrease in beer demand then results in the decrease in demand and consumption of the other (marijuana). This presents a very clear process that the decrease in one leads to decrease in other hence they are complementary goods.
1. We can analyze the possible social benefits or consequences by creating a standard that deemed as 'desirable' social situation and measures the situation before and after the militarization.
If after the militarization our society got closer to the desirable outcome, we would say that the militarization produces a social benefit.
2. We could take a look at the example of American military occupation in Iraq.
Initially, we intended for the militarization to create a democratic country in iraq after we remove the dictator from power.
But it only resulted in a vacuum that attract many radical groups to came in to control the country. In this case, we can conclude that the militarization produce more consequences than benefit.
