It is negative, and the purpose is saying the outcome will be dangerous to us
Though Brutus’ speech was logical and concise and he thought that the crowd would rally to his cause, he failed to gain. Brutus was demanded the people to listen hear him. He tried to win the people over and support through logical explanations. He listed down the reasons for killing Caesar and was very concise in his speech as he believed the truth will convince the people and rally to his cause. The problem was the people didn’t connect with his arguments and he was too aloof in his approach that he failed to gain their support and he should make a speech wherein he had a personal connection with the crowd.Anthony on the other hand asked the people to hear him. His agreement of the senate’s actions was for the subtle purpose of discrediting all that they said. Listing down the achievements of Caesar, he was all manipulating the crowd by appealing to their emotion. As he made his speech, he was crying and this moved the crowd enabling him to win them over. Anthony was the better orator because of his use of emotion and facts.<span>
</span>
Answer:
Is this for English 2 honors? I just did this
Explanation:
Answer:
Root words
Explanation:
Often, root words are used in the making of new words. The word created from it will have meanings related to its root word, which allows one to get an idea of what the unfamiliar word could mean.
You could go into more depth about the conflict in the story and ask how that could happen in real life.
