Answer:
The reasons for using the variable-cost approach include all of the following except
this approach provides the most defensible bases for justifying prices to all interested parties.
Explanation:
This is not part of the reasons for using the variable-cost approach. But options b, c, and d are certainly the reasons why the variable-cost approach is used. The variable-cost approach provides a differential analysis for decision-making. It assigns overhead costs to the period in which they are incurred, while other variable costs are assigned to the merchandise produced within that period. Thus, by excluding fixed manufacturing overhead cost, only the direct costs associated with production are used in accounting for the product's costs.
Answer: $7,000
Explanation:
The book value of the pump is the same as the value stated by the accountants.
The accountants are skilled in the field and most probably used accounting assessment techniques which were based on certain assumptions by accounting bodies so their valuation of the pump is to be considered the book value.
Answer:
40.91%
Explanation:
Duration perpetuity = 1.04/4%
Duration perpetuity = 1.04/0.04
Duration perpetuity = 26 years
Now, 17 = (Wz)*4 + (1 - Wz)*26
17 = 4Wz + 26 - 26Wz
26Wz - 4Wz = 26 - 17
22Wz = 9
Wz = 9/22
Wz = 0.409091
Wz = 40.91%
So, 40.91% of its portfolio should be allocated to the zero-coupon bonds to immunize, if there are no other assets funding the plan.
In 2007, Petra spent <u>$2,340</u> on wages for her employees each week, and Petra increased her annual wage budget from 2008 by <u>$14,56</u>0.
<h3>
Calculation of wages</h3>
Note: This question is not complete. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:
Petra owns a coffee shop. She has ten employees. In 2007, she paid her employees minimum wage ($5.85 an hour). In 2008, the minimum wage increased to $6.55 an hour. In 2009, the minimum wage increased to $7.25 an hour. Petra is paying her ten employees for 40 hours a week 52 weeks each year. In 2007 Petra spent___ on wages for her employees each week. When the minimum wage rose in 2009, Petra had to increase her annual budget for wage from 2008 by___
We can now proceed as follows:
Weekly wage spent Petra in 2007 = 2007 minimum wage per hour * Number of employees * Number of hours per week = $5.85 * 10 * 40 = $2,340
Amount of increase in minimum wage per hour between 2008 and 2009 = $7.25 - 6.55 = $0.7/hour
Petra’s increase in annual budget for wages in 2009 = Amount of increase in minimum wage per hour between 2008 and 2009 * Number of employees * Number of hours per week * Number of weeks = $0.7 * 10 * 40 * 52 = $14,560
Learn more about wages here: brainly.com/question/15381069.
#SPJ4
