Answer:
Explanation below
Explanation:
Arguments about justice and rights are often arguments about the purpose, or telos of a social institution, which in turn reflect competing notions of the virtues the institution should honor and reward.
The statement above is the mind of Aristotle on disagreement.
<span>Unconscious thought processes constitute a Pervasive and powerful influence on personality.
The unconcious process played a really huge role in developing our core principles&Believes in determining what's right and wrong. Because of this , it will also influence our personalities and how we uniquely react in different situations</span>
El termino ciencias sociales es una denominacion generica para aquellas disciplinas o campos del saber que reclaman para si mismas la condicion de ciencias,que analizan y tratan distintos aspectos de los grupos sociales y de los seres humanos en sociedad,y se ocupan tanto de sus manifestaciones materiales como de las inmateriales.
Answer:
both the seller and the agent or designated broker could be found in violation of the fair housing laws.
Explanation:
The Fair Housing Act has made it very clear that every person in the protected class has a right to rent or own a residential property in areas where they could previously not do so. This Act is considered a vital one when it comes to modern civil rights enforcement. If a buyer in the protected class is denied or withheld from renting or buying a property, then the seller and the broker can be said to have violated the Fair Housing Act.
Answer:
Carnegie and Rockefeller both believed that the person who has a lot should give out to those who have less, and not stingy with the money. The rich man who is not sharing his wealth is the disgraced man.
Explanation:
<u>Carnegie has once stated, “He who dies rich, dies disgraced." This means that the one that has so much money that he can’t spend until his death so that he dies clutching on that money should be ashamed</u><u>. </u>Carnegie wanted to share his wealth and did not think it is fair that he has so much while some people have nothing. His moral obligation dictated him to share his money and let other people benefit from it.
<u>Rockefeller followed his example and decided to spend the fortune helping others as well. </u>Both industrials felt it is the only ethical thing to do if someone is as rich as they are.
<u>These feelings had also to do with their religious learnings and the faith that a good, honest religious man should always share with others who have less. </u>
