1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariulka [41]
3 years ago
8

In what ways did the conflict over the Second Bank of the United States reveal the growing sectionalism in the U.S.?

History
2 answers:
Andrei [34K]3 years ago
6 0

The Second Bank of the United States was located in Philadelphia, it was a private corporation with public duties. It was established in 1816 and regulated money for the government. The conflict over this bank reveals the growing sectionalism in the Us during that time because the East and North of the US supported the Bank, but the West did not.

Andrew Jackson was against it, he was personally anti-bank and did everything to kill its reputation. This led to the Bank War led by Jackson and Henry Clay.

The Second Bank became the center of 1832 president election, Jackson won the election and closed the bank by removing its federal deposits.

Luden [163]3 years ago
5 0
It did because the people were upset with the second back of the United Staes. 
You might be interested in
What steps did the supporters of United States isolationism take to ensure that the country remained neutral in an international
kherson [118]
<span>Isolationism in America was based on two beliefs. The first was the view that the United States should avoid any political commitment that tied American policy and action to the policies and actions of other nations. The second was a pervasive belief that the central aim of American foreign policy was to avoid foreign wars at all costs. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Give two reasons why rubber became such an important commodity
EleoNora [17]
1) it helped to be able to make more merchandise
2) it made people get more money in buisnesses
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were people emphatic about adding a bill of rights
ki77a [65]

Answer:

Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which statement BEST explains why a citizen would participate in an interest group rather than a political party?
shusha [124]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Interest groups do indeed focus on a specific political issue rather than a big party like the democrats/republicans.

4 0
2 years ago
The declaration of independence intended to end british rules in the colonies, and grant citizens.
Nimfa-mama [501]
The right to Life liberty and pursuit of happiness (meaning you are allowed to do what makes you happy)
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Black Codes were
    14·1 answer
  • Which describes an effect of the Protestant and Catholic reformations?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the first Americans get to North America
    5·1 answer
  • Did new Netherland grew slowly
    12·2 answers
  • What are the positive and negative effects of negotiating treaties to solve difficulties
    14·1 answer
  • Please help will mark brainlest​
    6·2 answers
  • Kung ikaw ay naging biktima na nang pambubulas , paano mo ito nalampasan?​
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!
    10·2 answers
  • What two factors led to the us being considered a powerful nation during world war i?
    5·1 answer
  • How did women’s lives change in the late 1800s?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!