In what ways did the conflict over the Second Bank of the United States reveal the growing sectionalism in the U.S.?

2 answers:

6 0

The Second Bank of the United States was located in Philadelphia, it was a private corporation with public duties. It was established in 1816 and regulated money for the government. The conflict over this bank reveals the growing sectionalism in the Us during that time because the East and North of the US supported the Bank, but the West did not.

Andrew Jackson was against it, he was personally anti-bank and did everything to kill its reputation. This led to the Bank War led by Jackson and Henry Clay.

The Second Bank became the center of 1832 president election, Jackson won the election and closed the bank by removing its federal deposits.

Luden [163]2 years ago

5 0

It did because the people were upset with the second back of the United Staes.

You might be interested in

Can someone answer my questions please

iVinArrow [24]

What is your question

7 0

2 years ago

How successful were the allies in the beginning of the conflict?

vladimir1956 [14]

The Allies, Great Britain, US, France, and Soviet Union (and China) had a great defeat in the start as Germany quickly captured France in a short battle. This is were most concentration camps were held. The Allies suffered an extreme loss with this defeat of a strong ally.
Hope this helps... Please make brainiest! ☺

6 0

2 years ago

Review the sentences in bold. what does president lincoln express he did not want to do? give up the union assist the north work

vekshin1

I think it's A) Give up the union :))

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The state of the union address is important because it only addresses the strengths and successes of the previous years . Please

hichkok12 [17]

The answer would be the union address was addressing these strengths to give them power

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What were Alexander Hamilton’s arguments in support of the use of force in suppressing the Whiskey Rebellion?

Jet001 [13]

Answer:Hamilton was particularly strident in his support of the use of military force against the insurgents, whom he termed "traitors." He requested that Washington allow him to accompany the military, because, he told the General, it would be good public relations for the originator of the objectionable policy to put himself in harm's way for the sake of upholding the policy. Of course, Hamilton's presence in uniform at Washington's side as they rode out to engage the "traitors," had little but the opposite effect.

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago