Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Answer:
C
Explanation:because I just did that assignment on oddsseyware
Answer:
This sampling method is called cluster sampling.
Explanation:
In cluster sampling, the researcher will first divide the population into separate groups. The researcher in the passage focused on sixth graders of a certain state as his subjects. The next step is to select a simple random sample of clusters from that population. In this case, the researcher randomly selected 5% of the districts in the state, and administered the achievement test to their sixth graders. Therefore, we can safely say he used cluster sampling.
