Answer:
Reconstruction era began to restore the South after its destruction in the Civil War.
Explanation:
Reconstruction era tried to correct the issue of Southern state economic, political, and social. With the end of the Civil War, the Southern Economy was shattered with its currency invaluable, bankruptcy, fields with weeds.
Reconstruction, for the first time, introduced by President Lincoln to rebuilt the South again. There were several approaches regarding the Reconstruction in the South. Radicals believed that President Lincoln plan was not hash as it expected to be.
Presidential Reconstruction was the approach by President Lincoln that helped more tolerance way towards the South concerning plans for readmission to the Union.
Congressional Reconstruction (Radical) blamed the South and wanted to punish for causing the Civil War. They also introduced three amendments, including 13th, 14th, 15th Amendment. The amendments gave rights to the African American by making slavery illegal along with equal citizenship and protection of the laws.
Both wanted to rebuild the South and wanted to help after what they have suffered in the War.
Answer:
I would say A
Explanation:
If we do process of elimination, the Union army did not capture Richmond till the end of the war. They didn't win the next major battle and the Union lost the battle of Chancellorsville. Therefore they couldn't capture Chancellorsville.
Many Americans oppose U.S. participation in World War II for a number of reasons:
1) Americans did not want to have anything to do with any more European Wars, as the US went back to isolationism after World War I.
2) Because of a mixed population, it was better to wait for a reason to declare war, as the population was divided in between the two sides.
hope this helps
The correct answer is letter D
In Japan a well-developed feudal regime flourished. It is really one of the glories of that nation to have intuited the principles of wisdom that presided over the foundations of medieval feudalism. To have intuited this in such a way that, comparing the Japanese medieval regime with the medieval regime in the West, there are similarities.
One of the characteristics inherent to the feudal regime is a certain patriarchal sense of the greatness of the feudal lord, as a father and as a protector of those who are his vassals. In the feudal conception - this must be horrifying to the ears of Catholic progressives - the terms father and sir are similar. The father is master of his children. You are the father of your vassals. You assume the full protection of your vassals and defend them against external enemies. Such defense of the vassals is up to the lord rather than the king.
It follows that some notes present in the feudal constructions of the Middle Ages are factors of security, solidity and stability. But, simultaneously, such notes reflect a certain height, a certain challenge, a certain boldness typical of a power that is continually at war. War often led to exaggeration, even against real power. This came to be greatly weakened in Japan, partly because of feudalism, just as it was, at some point in the Middle Ages, in France.
In China, successful men often had concubines until the practice was outlawed after the Communist Party of China<span> came to power in 1949.</span>
