Supreme Court justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the United States Senate, as stated in the Constitution. ... Article III of the Constitution states that these judicial officers are appointed for a life term.
Senators represent entire states, whereas House members represent individual districts. Each state is represented in Congress by at least one representative.
<h3>Who is House Member and Senator ?</h3>
The structure, powers, and functions of both houses of Congress affect the policymaking process are mentioned below:
- Delegated powers necessitate collaboration between both houses of Congress. These powers include the authority to tax, borrow money, regulate commerce, raise an army, create and make rules for federal courts, and so on.
- The Congress also has the power of the purse, which it can use to influence the president or impose conditions on funding.
- Because the House of Representatives has 435 members, the process of debating bills is constrained. Because the Senate has only 100 members, there are few rules that govern it.
- The House Rules Committee is in charge of establishing or revising rules for amending bills. Open rules allow amendments to be added to bills, whereas closed rules do not allow amendments to be added to bills.
All bills that seek to raise funds must begin in the House of Representatives. The House has the authority to impeach, whereas the Senate has the authority to try impeachments. Furthermore, the Senate must approve treaties and presidential appointments such as ambassadors and Supreme Court justices.
To learn more about house and senate refer :
brainly.com/question/16036772
#SPJ4
They were all in Mesopotamia
Answer: Negatively
Explanation:
Enlightenment ideas were not completely against monarchs but did have problems with the absolute nature of the rule of said monarchs.
Before Enlightenment, monarchs generally ruled as they pleased with the logic being that they had the right to rule from God and so had the right to control the nation as their personal property.
Enlightenment was against this and instead espoused the logic that a monarch was only able to rule due to a social contract signed between them and the people whereby they would be allowed to rule provided they took care of their subjects.
Monarchs reacted to this with negativity because it meant that they had to stop being so selfish with resources and had to share power with the people. As time went on however, and with constant pressure on them, they had to relent and it led to the dissolution of several monarchies in Europe and the transition of others to Constitutional Monarchies.
Answer:
4
Explanation:
I think the correct answer is number 4 which is the teacher.
