Answer:
Management implies a conception and practice regarding power, administration and ways of building consensus and hegemony within an organization or institution. Management is the way to carry out the articulation between the perspectives, through the organizational modes that serve the same and that are consistent with the fines and objectives of the institution.
Explanation:
According to this, the management action crosses the entire institution, in its relationships, in internal coordination, in the ways of establishing work ties, working communities, in the set of options that are adopted when interacting with other institutions It is not just driving or direction. It is the coordination of work processes within the framework of an organization, where roles and tasks are given, which in principle can be articulated generating levels of management.
Answer:
Strategic Groups of Competitors
Explanation:
These are business competitors, maybe firms or companies that have a similar business model.In this view, such competitors apply same strategies and plans when running their operations.These competitors might have similar business objectives and goals.A good examples is when two companies focus on activities to sustain competitive advantages thus they can apply a similar model when breaking down the market.
Answer:
The interest rate is 11%
Explanation:
The loan amount = $50000
Interest amount = $5500
Since the annual interest amount and the principal amount is given so we have to find the interest rate by using the given information. Below is the formula to find the interest rate.
Let the interest rate = x
Principal × interest rate = Interest amount
$50000 × r = $5500
r = $5500 / $50000
r = 0.11 or 11%
The interest rate is 11%
where are the statements?
Answer: C. The court concluded that Microsoft violated the Sherman Act
Explanation: The case between United States v. Microsoft Corporation which took place at the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit during the period February 26–27, 2001 and was finally decided June 28, 2001.
It was decided by the District Court that Microsoft violated the Sharma Antitrust Act of 1890.
