The number of minutes that would pass before they were 1870 feet apart is 5.47 minutes
- Since one student runs at a speed of 180 feet per minutes, in time t minutes, he moves a distance of d = 180t.
- Also, the second student runs at a speed of 160 feet per minute, in time t minutes, he moves a distance of d' = 160t.
Since they are initially 10 feet apart, their total distance apart after t minutes is D = d + 10 + d'
D = 180t + 10 + 160t
D = 340t + 10
<h3>Number of minutes before they are 1870 feet</h3>
Making t subject of the formula, we have
t = (D - 10)/340
Since they are 1870 feet apart after t minutes, D = 1870 feet.
t = (D - 10)/340
t = (1870 - 10)/340
t = 1860/340
t = 5.47 minutes
So, the number of minutes that would pass before they were 1870 feet apart is 5.47 minutes
Learn more about minutes of distance apart here
brainly.com/question/8783264
Answer:
The volume of the prism is 
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The volume of the prism is equal to

where
B is the area of the triangular base
L is the length of the prism
we have

<em>Find the area of the base B</em>
The area of a equilateral triangle is equal to


substitute

Answer:
I am not sure but if p/8=0 then it is correct
hope it helps! :D
Answer: 88º
Step-by-step explanation:
180-47=133-45=88

Notice that

So as

you have

. Clearly

must converge.
The second sequence requires a bit more work.

The monotone convergence theorem will help here; if we can show that the sequence is monotonic and bounded, then

will converge.
Monotonicity is often easier to establish IMO. You can do so by induction. When

, you have

Assume

, i.e. that

. Then for

, you have

which suggests that for all

, you have

, so the sequence is increasing monotonically.
Next, based on the fact that both

and

, a reasonable guess for an upper bound may be 2. Let's convince ourselves that this is the case first by example, then by proof.
We have


and so on. We're getting an inkling that the explicit closed form for the sequence may be

, but that's not what's asked for here. At any rate, it appears reasonable that the exponent will steadily approach 1. Let's prove this.
Clearly,

. Let's assume this is the case for

, i.e. that

. Now for

, we have

and so by induction, it follows that

for all

.
Therefore the second sequence must also converge (to 2).