The answer would be part 2
Answer:
Option D, HFCs and HCFCs are less likely to deplete stratospheric ozone and contribute less to global warming than CFCs do
Explanation:
HFCs have the ability to replace CFCs. They are able to deplete the stratospheric ozone because they have chlorine. However, their ozone depletion potentials (ODPs) is quite less as compared to that of CFCs. HCFCs ozone depletion potentials (ODPs) is between 0.01 to 0.1 while that of CFCs is around 1. Hence, HCFCs deplete less stratospheric ozone and hence their contribution to global warming is comparatively low
Hence, option D is correct
Answer:
yes because it is their own opinion and scientist need a hypothesis
Explanation:
because you will acostumbrate to do that alway then when a accident happens you do not have the seat belt you could have a big accident
It is growing faster than China
