All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
Hey there!
One reason that Americans are against communism is that they have seen it fail in disasters in so many countries.
Mao Zedong, the communist leader of China, setting up a nationalist regime that led to the death of tens of millions of people. Communism also failed in the Soviet Union, North Korea, and Vietnam.
Americans want to live in a free market economy where they work and keep what they earn. With communism, the government owns all of the means of production, so people's money goes into a national money pool that is equally distributed among other people that might not have worked as hard.
I hope this helps!
Answer: the Mongols constructed the larges Eurasian empire to date. ... They encouraged trade and exchange across the Eurasian network. • The fostered the spread of the Black Death across Eurasia.
Explanation:
<span>Czar Nicholas II was executed by
Bolshevik forces in July of 1918. The Bolsheviks were committed to the
ideas of Karl Marx, and they believed that the working classes would
free themselves from the economic and political control of the ruling
class. They wanted to form a socialist society based on equality. The
provisional government was never elected, and it chose to remain in
World War I, despite the fact that the country was ill-equipped to fight
against Germany. This made people more in favor of the revolution.
Please mark me as brainliest
</span>
