FIRST TO ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST!!!!
When looking at this map of the Middle East, you would find a huge population ofJews around #4.
true
The correct answer for this question is this one: "c. structural unemployment." If an individual who cannot find a job because his or her job skills have become obsolete this is an example of structural unemployment. It is <span>a form of </span>unemployment<span> caused by a mismatch between the skills that workers in the economy can offer, and the skills demanded of workers by employers</span>
Generally, the Supreme Court has final appellate jurisdiction over both State and federal cases involving preserved federal questions
Answer:
Rationalization.
Explanation:
Rationalization is explained here as an ego defense mechanism that people use to make excuses for situations or events in their lives that they do not like. This is seen here as Bruce's case because he is vehemently trying to turn the irrational in his present situation to rational. People use it often when they are angry, depressed, scared or hurt.
The mechanism usually works negatively to make the person feel worse about the situation or event rather than better. Rationalization is a type of cognitive distortion.
In cases like this when people rationalize, they turn irrational things into rational.
Answer:
The U.S. government made reservations the centerpiece of Indian policy around 1850, and thereafter reserves became a major bone of contention between natives and non-natives in the Pacific Northwest. However, they did not define the lives of all Indians. Many natives lived off of reservations, for example. One estimate for 1900 is that more than half of all Puget Sound Indians lived away from reservations. Many of these natives were part of families that included non-Indians and children of mixed parentage, and most worked as laborers in the non-Indian economy. They were joined by Indians who migrated seasonally away from reservations, and also from as far away as British Columbia. As Alexandra Harmon's article "Lines in Sand" makes clear, the boundaries between "Indian" and "non-Indian," and between different native groups, were fluid and difficult to fix. Reservations could not bound all Northwest Indians any more than others kinds of borders and lines could.
