Answer:
double-barreled question
Explanation:
A double-barreled question is a question that comprises two or more topics or issues , but is expected to have just one answer. A double barreled question is sometimes referred to as an informal fallacy. It also be called a double-direct question or compound question. It is usually advisable to avoid such questions in survey, but can be used in court during cross examination or other researches.
For example the question above touches on two separate issues: the use of reinforcement and the use of punishment at the same time, by parents, as a means to increase the likelihood of desirable behaviors in their children. Stacy found it difficult to answer this question because it is a double-barreled question.
Generally, the Supreme Court has final appellate jurisdiction over both State and federal cases involving preserved federal questions
Answer: At about the same time as.
In his study, Turiel interviewed children using hypothetical situations that resembled the types of struggles raised by the real-life events. The way that these children reasoned was very similar across real and hypothetical moral issues. Thus, we can say that children's ability to tell whether a character in a story has violated moral rules develops at about the same time as their ability to understand them in real life.
Answer:
No, providing the jurisdiction follows the objective test
Explanation:
The objective test is aimed at providing evidence of objective nature, Meaning that in order for Jin to be accused the prosecutor has to prove that another reasonable person would not act like him in the same situation.
Anne Frank is unable to forgive her mother for taking Margot out
shopping and they didnt bring her along. Anne began to cry and then they
laughed.
