That's correct, it's option D) Both A and B.
Option C looks incorrect due to the misuse of punctuation. Since the conjunction "and" was added, there is no reason to use a semicolon before it in this situation.
Option A uses correct punctuation, comma, before the conjunction "and". Let's keep it in mind that it is a conjunction's role to connect two sentences in order to form a compound one.
Option B is also correct because, even though it does not use a conjunction to connect the sentences, it uses the semicolon to indicate the sentences are related, that their ideas are connected.
Answer:
The answer is the option C
Explanation:
The speaker is trying to anticapte and address with counter-arguments from his/her opponent using the themes that can be uses against him/her,also the speaker uses this approach to talk about his/her ideas and making his rival's ideas look worse.
Answer:
The narrator's refusal of the master's wishes for him to cross himself and kiss the crucifix are signs of Puritan influence.
Explanation:
Puritans reject the use of the crucifix and all practices they deem non-biblical.
1- In Bradbury's <span>Fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. In the Nazi Germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge Nazism.
2- Was Bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of </span><span>“Where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? In some way, yes. When knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. Just like in the novel, people in Nazi Germany who owned <span>subversive</span> books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. If a person was seen being confiscated <span>subversive </span>books, they may be considered as an ally to the Jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. Because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.
In this way, the phrase </span><span>“Where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.</span>
