To make a positive factual statement about your civilization on the basis of comparison with some other civilization, it is necessary to carry out in-depth research from reliable sources on the main aspects of a society.
<h3 /><h3>Positive factual statement</h3>
It corresponds to an empirical statement, where there is no value judgment, that is, it does not come from an opinion that indicates approval or disapproval on a topic.
This resource is used to explain theories and concepts, and should be prioritized when writing an academic essay, where facts must be used to support the argument and generate greater reliability about the text.
Therefore, to write a positive statement about your civilization compared to an ancient civilization for example, it is essential to use book, indexes, documents and reliable sources to support your argument.
Find out more information about positive statement here:
brainly.com/question/4891924
Richard Nixon's diplomatic relations with China was mainly an attempt to B.) put political pressure on the Soviet Union.
Answer:
the answer is B Control of the port city would be vital for the U.S. economy.
Explanation:
Answer:
<h2>The power of judicial review</h2>
Explanation/context:
Judicial review refers to the Supreme Court's ability to review any law to see if it violates the US Constitution. Marbury v. Madison (1803) is considered the landmark case for the Supreme Court asserting its authority of judicial review.
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). Nevertheless, in making their statement about the case, the Court established the principle of judicial review.
