All categories

3 years ago

Which statement best describes the power of government provided by the articles of confederation?

2 answers:

5 0

The answer to this question is C. The states had more power than the national government Articles of Confederation was agreed upon by united states' first 13 states. During their meeting, they agree to let the states held the power that could be described as the power that usually given to the king in monarch system and his parliament.

Nimfa-mama [501]3 years ago

3 0

The state had more power than the national government

Further Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was constituted on 1 March 1781 and this was the first Constitution of the U.S. The replacement was done in 1787 with the name of the “Constitutional Convention”. The Constitution came into force in 1789 and all the articles were replaced. It had too many weaknesses. The first one is that it gave state government enormous powers, whereas the federal government was not given powers up to the level of state government. With these powers, the states started to misuse them like they starting making money of their own and does not follow laws made by the federal government, or any of the decisions of federal courts.The entities in the Confederation like the states make up the whole government. They have all the powers. Initially, the United States had a Confederate form of government that was established by the Articles of Confederation. But when the USA's Constitution came into force the US became a federal form of government. The members of the confederation have the authority to secede from the union.

So, to overcome the loopholes, the articles were replaced in the constitution, they strived to create a powerful government with a division of powers between the central and the state. It ensured checks and balances by applying “separation of powers” to all branches of government.

Learn More:

1. In a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. Is elected by representatives chosen by the people. Is the leader of the party that won the most seats in the Parliament? Is elected directly by the people.

brainly.com/question/477236

2. A main purpose of the president’s state of the union address is to

brainly.com/question/673180

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Social Science

Chapter: U.S. Constitution

Keywords: Articles of Confederation, 1 March 1781, first Constitution, 1787, Constitutional Convention 1789, state government enormous powers, misuse, do not follow laws, the federal government, division of powers, checks and balances, separation of powers.

You might be interested in

Can you think of other times in American history in which the government has sought to balance constitutional rights and individ

Hoochie [10]

If it is ok to answer the first question, I think when they ended slavery because they though about the citizen's rights and what the owners might think

6 0

3 years ago

The rules of experimentation suggest: a. word of mouth is a useless data source b. three experts must agree on a topic before it

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer: A. Word of mouth is a useless data source.

Explanation: Experimentation refers to an empirical procedure or process which is used to validate an hypothesis or establish a fact. However, experimentation requires rules which guides the process, these rules are necessary in other to avoid bias, false conclusions or inference.

According to the options given in the question above, facts used in experimentation should be traceable and reproducible. Word of the mouth is a useless data source as it usually has no empirical basis. Expert opinion or information being established by three or six sources could be considered as a fact.

3 0

3 years ago

How would life be different without the 26th amendment?

andriy [413]

The 26th Amendment allows those who turn 18 years old, the legal right to vote. So, if we did not have the 26th Amendment, technically speaking, anyone would be allowed to vote at any age. This could render elections unfair, as families with more children than others would have more voting power.

5 0

3 years ago

During the late 19th century and early 20th century, what doctrine was used to justify treating immigrants from different region

evablogger [386]

Social Darwinism was most likely applied to treat immigrants from different regions differently, however, Social Darwinism does not specifically relate to immigrants but also to all members of society. In the American context, the notion was implemented to popularize the notion of "survival of the fittest" or that the strongest members of a society will succeed and the political system should support this theory.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did southern legislatures enact Jim Crow laws after Reconstruction? Group of answer choices

meriva

The correct answer is letter A.

Explanation: The laws were intended to give African Americans even less rights in society by forcing them to change to the North (Great Migration).

Jim Crow Laws was state and local laws enacted in the United States that institutionalized racial segregation, affecting African Americans, Asians, and other ethnic groups. Effective between 1876 and 1965. A "Jim Crow epoch" or a "Jim Crow era" refers to the time when this practice occurs. Major laws require that public schools and most public places (including trains and buses) have separate facilities for whites and blacks. These Jim Crow Laws were distinct from the Black Codes (1800-1866), which restricted African American civil liberties and rights.

4 0

3 years ago