Answer: B
Similar to a teacher teaching world history which develops accurate studied terms and more information!
( Baby learns how to walk with parent )
Answer:
The right option is D.
Explanation:
The Zulus lived in separate clans, without a common leader, similar to the Mongols who also lived in separate clans and were only united under Genghis Khan's rule. Shaka managed to unite his people, and also conquered several other tribes. In a few years, he had over 200.000 new followers coming from his conquests.
The Mongol empire was known for allowing its conquered folks to still keep their lifestyles, as long as they were loyal to them. They did not destroy everything they touched, and only wiped out those clans who directly opposed them.
Shaka was also similar, as his goal was to rule over a vast territory. When he first came to power, his tribe was composed of about 1500 people and even fewer warriors. But by the time of his death, he ruled over about 500.000 people, from all the territories and tribes he conquered.
Shaka had two half brothers, who made at least 2 failed assassination attempts on Shaka. After that, with support from the Mpondo people, Shaka was killed by 3 assassins, in 1828.
Here is the full question:
<span>Struggling, unpublished writers are sure that publishers, who seek out and publish new authors, are nonexistent.
Find and correct the error in this sentence
The correct sentence should be without the second comma:
</span>Struggling, unpublished writers are sure that publishers who seek out and publish new authors are nonexistent.
publishers who seek out and publish new authors are nonexistent is a part of one clause that does not possess two different meaning, so it should not be separated by a comma.
'
Bias and prejudice is basically when someone has hate toward another group of people or dislike that group of people because they don’t have the same beliefs or view points some people don’t even know that they are doing it which is called unconscious bias and some people do it and don’t care. Hope this helped
<span>No, because the right to free speech allows for a reasonable regulation of time, place, and manner so long as the regulation is content neutral.
The right of free speech that Citizens in United States have extended until those citizens cause a certain amount of harm toward other citizens. If this happens, both other citizens and the Defense Department have the right to stop the speech..
</span>
