1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Hunter-Best [27]
3 years ago
5

What was the state of the nation when Queen Elizabeth took the throne? a. It was in a state of prosperity. c. It was in a state

of bankruptcy and religious discord. b. It was in a state of war. d. none of these
History
2 answers:
DENIUS [597]3 years ago
6 0
Hi!

I believe that the answer is C.It was in a state of bankruptcy and religious discord . The nation was in a state of bankruptcy and religious discord .

Hope it helps and have a wonderful day!
TEA [102]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is C) It was in a state of bankruptcy and religious discord.

The state of the nation when Queen Elizabeth took the throne was a state of bankruptcy and religious discord.

Queen Elizabeth took the throne of Great Britain on June 2, 1953. King George VI had died and her daughter Elizabeth took the throne when she was 25 years old. In that time she was crowned Queen of the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zeland, Canada, South Africa Sri Lanka, and Pakistan. Although the state of the nation was a state of bankruptcy and religious discord she knew how to command the nation and reestablish order.  

You might be interested in
OMG PLLLS HELP! BRAINLIEST IF RIGHT! NO GUESSES THANKYOUUUUUUUUUUUU
sertanlavr [38]
Its C thucydides.........
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the leader of the Britanies?
Vlad [161]

Answer:

Brittany Alexandra Leader,

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Which branch of government represented the common people of the Roman Republic
viva [34]
<span>C Assembly of tribes

</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Write your research question below.
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

There's nothing here for me to answer.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
11.
LiRa [457]

Answer: Leaders agreed that a stronger national government was needed.

Explanation:

The American economy immediately after the American Revolution had a lot of subsistence farmers with little access to hard currency and as a result could not pay off debts they owed. Veterans from the war were in debt as well as they were finding it difficult to get money they were owed by the government.

This led to widespread discontent that boiled over to the Shay's rebellion. As the dissidents marched on a Federal armoury, the Federal government could do nothing as they had very limited powers and could not fund their soldiers as a result.

When the rebellion was eventually put down by state militia, people saw the need for a stronger national government that could react to such problems and more should the need arise.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The settlers in texas upset the goverment of Spain Mexico or California
    5·2 answers
  • Leonardo da Vinci created his work during the
    12·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP!!!!! ASAP!!!!! It's volunteer time! You've decided to become a Red Cross volunteer. You want to convince your friends i
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the leader of the political machine that controlled New York City in the late 1800s
    12·1 answer
  • The Indian conflicts in the West—especially in the Great Plains—arose because Native Americans and settlers had completely diffe
    13·1 answer
  • A muslim title meaning successor or deputy is​
    14·2 answers
  • Please helppppp ASAP mark you Brainliest
    14·1 answer
  • True/false the us supported president diem during the early years of the Vietnam war
    8·1 answer
  • 5) Immersive Reader
    15·1 answer
  • The fictional country of kovasia decides to open its market to foreign businesses. what positive and negative effects will kovas
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!