Answer:
Permits will be the best option
Explanation:
Assuming the cost per ton of polution reduction follows a linear progression and it can reach zero
<u>The best option will be the permits:</u>
As Firm B will eliminate their polution and sale his permis to Firm A
That occur as Firm B is more efficient in doing this will sale to Firm A
In the end Firm A will have all the permits and continue to produce 200 tons
but Firm B will produce none achieving the goal of 50% reduction with the least economic impact.
This is a market solution which little intervention from the Gvernment
Cost to eliminate 200 polution with permits:
200 x $10 = 2,000
If we force each company to reduce pollution Firm A higher cost will create deadweight-loss
100 x $20 = 2,000
100 x $10 = <u> 1,000</u>
3,000
A comparative advantage exists when the possible value of specialization is lower than that of different nations. The life of comparative advantage is, in turn, suffering from things consisting of abundance, productivity, cost of exertions, land, and capital.
Comparative gain refers back to the capacity to produce goods and services at a decreased opportunity value, no longer necessarily at a greater volume or quality. Comparative advantage is a key insight that trade will still arise despite the fact that one u . s . has an absolute advantage in all products.
Comparative gain is a key principle in global trade and paperwork the basis of why free change is useful to nations. The idea of comparative advantage indicates that even supposing a country enjoys an absolute advantage in the manufacturing of goods, trade can nonetheless be beneficial to each trading partner.
Learn more about Comparative Advantage here:brainly.com/question/2827889
#SPJ4
ACE will end the contract. The home owner may be charged for default.
Answer:
to have part of the stock such as let’s say you had Walmart and you had some of the stock well you own part of the company and make money from it
Explanation:
