Well you would have to do your research for that honestly it could be two answers
Answer:
Rapid economic growth generated vast wealth during the Gilded Age. New products and technologies improved middle-class quality of life. Industrial workers and farmers didn't share in the new prosperity, working long hours in dangerous conditions for low pay. Gilded Age politicians were largely corrupt and ineffective.
Explanation:
The Great Depression was known as the worst economic period in history. The Great Depression was caused by the stock market crash of October 1929. It was also a cause of the federal government and their relativity. After the crash of the stock market, there was a loss of about 90% of value between the years of 1929 and 1933. There was a great deal of effects on U.S. citizens caused by the Great Depression. Unemployment rates rose to 25%, leaving people without jobs, and without jobs they could not support their families. The housing prices had dropped 67%, and homelessness rates skyrocketed. The American banking system collapse, and industrial production began dropping. These are only a few example of the many. In order to pick up and fix what the Great Depression caused, President Roosevelt created what is called the New Deal, which helped many people to get back on their feet. The New Deal was a group of domestic policies, a series of programs, and financial reforms. It was enacted in the United States between the years of 1933 and 1939. The New Deal had drastically expanded the role of the federal government in response to the Great Depression.
Answer:
It was an oil-exporting nation.
Explanation:
During the 1980s, the Soviet Union saw a severe downturn in oil prices. This, in turn, led to a decrease in production. Between 1988 and 1995, the oil production of the nation dropped by almost 50%. During this time period, oil was one of the main exports of the Soviet Union, which meant that these fluctuations in price greatly damaged its economy. Moreover, the damage to the economy weakened the nation, allowing for the change of regime to take place.
Answer for your first question:
- Separation of powers refers to each branch of government having their own distinct powers, while checks and balances refers to the ability of each branch to prevent another branch from becoming too powerful.
For your second question:
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8033338#readmore
<em>[Proper form on Brainly is to ask just one question per post.]</em>
<u>Explanation in regard to your first question:</u>
The "separation of powers" principle was an idea embedded into the plans for American government by our founding fathers, based on their reading of Enlightenment political theory. The terminology "separation of powers" was introduced by Charles-Louis de Secondat, the Baron of Montesquieu. (Usually he's referred to as just "Montesquieu.") He wrote an important work of political theory called <em>The Spirit of the Laws</em>, published in 1748.
Within his treatment of how governments will function best, Montesquieu argued that executive, legislative, and judicial functions of government ought to be divided between parts of the government, so that no one person or division of the government can infringe on the overall rights of others in the government or of the members of the society overall. The framers of the United States Constitution embedded the separation of powers into the plan for US government.
As noted by <em>The History Channel, </em> "In addition to this separation of powers, the framers built a system of checks and balances designed to guard against tyranny by ensuring that no branch would grab too much power." Some examples of the checks and balances used would be:
- Congress (the Legislative Branch) controls the government's budget, so the Executive Branch needs Congress's support to fund any of its desired initiatives.
- The President nominates federal officials, but those nominations must be confirmed by the Senate.
- The President has the ability to veto laws passed by Congress, requiring a two-thirds majority to override his veto.
- The Supreme Court and other federal courts (the Judicial Branch of government) can rule that laws passed by Congress or executive orders by the President are unconstitutional, blocking their implementation.
