Answer:
subpoena
Explanation:
In most cases, the order comes because the court needs that person to give a certain testimony or giving proof to evidence. Failure to follow this order is very unlikely to be punished by jail time but it's definitely would result in fines/other monetary punishment.
Answer:
the collective unconscious
Explanation:
The collective unconscious: The concept of collective unconscious was proposed by the famous psychoanalyst named Carl Jung and is also referred to as the objective psyche. According to Carl Jung, the collective unconscious is described as the aspects that a section or portion of the deepest unconscious mind isn't created through personal experience but rather it is being genetically inherited.
Carl Jung believed that an individual is unaware of the different items stored in his or her collective unconscious.
Example: the father-child or mother-child relationship.
Answer:
Africa they were strong supporters of the Pan African movement
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
