Which motivation theory might explain one’s need for financial security? I would say humanistic theory of motivation because I would consider it a basic human right to have financial security.
Answer:
$12.5
Explanation:
Given that,
Annual dividend paid = $1.50 per share
Equity cost of capital = 12%
The value of a share of NoGrowth's stock is determined by dividing the annual dividend paid by the equity cost of capital of the firm.
Value of share:
= Annual dividend paid ÷ Equity cost of capital
= $1.50 per share ÷ 0.12
= $12.5
Therefore, the value of a share of NoGrowth's stock is closest to $12.50.
Answer:
Dollar return
= Closing price - Opening price + Divided
= $77.24 - $73.02 + $0.34
= $4.56
Percent return
= <u>Dollar return</u> x 100
Opening price
= <u>$4.56</u> x 100
$73.02
= 6.24%
Explanation:
The dollar return is calculated as closing price minus opening price plus dividend. The percent return is the ratio of dollar return to opening price multiplied by 100.
Hello There!
Your answer would be <u>C). A tortious act may also be a criminal act.</u>
The reason why C would be your answer is because a tortious act is something that harms someone in any way. The reason why it "may" be a criminal act is because determine if the tortious act is a criminal act really depends on the scenario that is occurring. For example, someone could cause a tortious act in a way of self defense, this scenario would be debatable because the person that committed the tortious act had a valid reason in doing so, and that was protecting themselves. But, if a person was to cause a tortious act by hurting someone to steal from them, then that would definitely be a criminal act because they are performing dangerous things to someone else, and the person could file a lawsuit against it.
Let's dive into why the other answer choices are incorrect. We can use the old fashion process of elimination:
Answer choice "A). A tortious act is always a criminal act" is incorrect because it is not always a criminal act, it depends on the scenario it's in. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "B). A criminal act is always a tortious act" is incorrect because there are MANY criminal acts that doesn't harm anyone, for example, tax evasion (not paying taxes) is a criminal act, but does not cause any harm to anyone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "D). A tortious act is the same as a contract dispute" is incorrect because harming someone is not the same as not doing what a contract says. A contact dispute is when someone that's part of a contract did not do a duty that the contract says that they're suppose to do, and that usually doesn't have to be any harm to anyone. That would not be the same as a tortious act, harming someone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
The Manger Has exercised <u>Concurrent Control</u> on Evan by taking the decision to retrain him.
Explanation:
Concurrent control as the name suggest is the type of control that takes place in the Real-time or at the time the mistake occur.It is a type of a ongoing control and is a continuous process.
This type of control is used to monitor those employees who directly interact with the customers
<u>For Example</u>: A restaurant waiter must be aware about the menu list(Starters,Main Course),A car sales man should be aware about the features of the car and its USP(Unique Selling Proportion)