The answer is progressive conservative party .
The Enlightenment appears as a need to deny the divine right of the king, so the first option offered is excluded. As such, it propagated science, democracy, social justice, a democratic government, against the absolute and ecclesiastical dogma, which includes the secularist attitude and the understanding of the world on the basis of it. By advocating a democratic government that is overthrown by the majority if it is not for the benefit of the people, it means examining and confirming the natural rights that people possess. The Enlightenment does not adopt anything without questioning, examining and scientific approach, which excludes the fourth option, while it is very much concerned with the examination of authority, since the emphasis is on the law of nature, the natural law of the authority is always examined.
The correct options are B. C. and E.
A. Original sin
This should be the answer
When interest rates are increased, borrowing money becomes more expensive. This translates into both individuals and buisnesses having to slow down their enconomic growth, because financing their activities or production also becomes more expensive.
The Federal Reserve has the <u>double-task</u> of keeping prices manageable in a flourishing economy while keeping unemployment as low as possible. When there's inflation, it's been proven that slowing down the economy by increasing interest rates, tends to reduce inflation. That's why it's a good option. We have to keep in mind, however, that this will raise unemployment as a collateral effect.
As you can see, there's no easy answer when it comes to balancing all factors at the same time.
Hope this helps!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
No, I don't think that any of these industries are morally wrong?
As the passage in the Bible says: "the one who is not guilty of nothing can throw the first rock," which menas that nobody has granted us the right to judge.
It is true that there are many industries that are controversial among animal advocacy groups. Some of these include rodeos, horse racing, circuses, hunting,
Many of these companies do not have the proper facilities or the proper care for animals. But that is not the case of all.
Although this is a controversial issue, some of these companies take care of animals and employ hundreds of people that support their families and pay taxes. Furthermore, they fulfill an important function in the entertainment industry.
So my suggestion would be that federal and state regulations could be more strict to protect animals, by closing those industries is not the better option.