1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dlinn [17]
3 years ago
9

how was congress able to stop the Reagan administration's support for the nicarian contras? A. by declaring support for the Sand

inistas B. by cutting off funds used for support C. by holding president Reagan in contempt D. by negotiating through the vice president​
History
1 answer:
algol [13]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B is the answer to the question

You might be interested in
Which of the following is not characteristic of Maryland?
Sedaia [141]
A marland was the firat propreitary coloney
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
From 1900-1941 what was the key aim of American policy in Asia?
GaryK [48]

Answer:

United States foreign policy between 1901 and 1941 can be characterized as generally confident, sometimes aggressive and, occasionally, even cautious.  The first twenty years of the century saw the U.S. leadership pursue confidently interventionist strategies in dealing with other countries.  The next decade-a-half witnessed a clear modification toward cautious non-entanglement if not outright isolationism.   With the election of Franklin Roosevelt to the White House a gap grew between the isolationist American public and an increasingly internationalist policy.  This gap temporarily disappeared with Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor and America’s entry into World War II.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is a CHECK that the Legislative Branch has over the Executive Branch?
mart [117]

Answer: B

Explanation: The President in the executive branch can veto a law, but the legislative branch can override that veto with enough votes. The legislative branch has the power to approve Presidential nominations, control the budget, and can impeach the President and remove him or her from office.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the effect of the Indian removal act of 1830
klasskru [66]

Answer:it forced Native Americans from the areas where they had lived for hundreds of years

Explanation:just answered it on my quiz and it was correct

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Choose three of the acts of roosevelt's new deal and write a report. include in your report the effect of each act on the united
    13·1 answer
  • A government action that denies someone fair and equal treatment under the law may be declared ___.
    11·2 answers
  • Which civilizations developed in the fertile valley between the tigris and euphrates rivers?
    7·2 answers
  • Name one bad thing that was traded on the Colombian Exchange.
    14·1 answer
  • Bill Clinton defeated in the 1992 presidential election.
    12·2 answers
  • What do i need to know
    13·1 answer
  • What major event took place in Nuremberg after WWII ended?
    15·1 answer
  • Population growth and the domestication of plants and animals brought on new cultural changes, such as
    11·1 answer
  • After the Civil War, some Kiowa and Comanche tribes agreed to move to reservations but found it difficult to assimilate.
    7·2 answers
  • What made it difficult for freed Americans to take advantage of the homestead act?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!