Answer:
Nationalism is an ideology or worldview in which national identity is crucial for the formation and survival of a sovereign state. According to some nationalists, for members of one nation the relationship to the nation is more important than any other element of personal or collective identity and any other relationship of loyalty.
In the 20th century, nationalist leaders aimed to provide decent living conditions for broad sections of the people of their nations. Now, this situation, strengthened after the First World War, was taken over by right-wing totalitarian ideologies. Therefore, nationalism in various manifestations of fascism became an inseparable part of these ideologies, that build a vision of universal ideological unity of the people, one-party rule, militarism and statism.
Thus, Nazism made use of these tools (the fragility of the Weimar Republic, the hyperinflation in Germany, the growing poverty of its population and the discontent after the Treaty of Versailles) to promote an exacerbated nationalism that culminated in the development of ideas totalitarian within the German people itself.
1st optionnn correct me if I’m wrong please
According to Smarthistory, The Neolithic Revolution is so named because it took place during the Neolithic era, or New Stone Age, around 11,500 to 5,000 years ago. This dramatic change is sometimes called the Agricultural Revolution because it rests on a knowledge of plant and animal husbandry.
mark brainliest :)
In my opinion, yes, there are still groups who are disenfranchised and not considered as an equal source of power in our democracy. An example of these people is those in the lower class of the society. In today's setting, only the 'representatives' have power and those whom they represent do not. <span />
Hey there!
The answer is A. That slavery was still allowed in a free nation.
One of the things the colonists fought for was freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press along with other things.
However, for hundreds of thousands of slaves torn away from their homes, they had none of these freedoms. They were considered inferior and not people.
A paradox is a statement that seems absurd of self-contradictory, which this statement very much is. If the U.S. is a free nation, then why do hundreds of thousands of people living there have no freedoms, stolen from them by the very people who advocated for their own freedom?
Hope this helps!
