Answer:
Option A The impact of a change in the local currency on inflow and outflow variables can sometimes be indirect and therefore different from what is expected.
Explanation:
The reason is that the changes in the currency exchange rate in which the company receives the payment and is also not a home currency, such risk exposure is known as economic exposure. So the only option that correct here is option A.
Option B is incorrect because depreciation is non cash item and it is not exposed to currency fluctuations.
Option C and D are also incorrect because domestic firms don't face any economic exposure.
I believe in this case that ABC motors is the customer
and the car was still being delivered to their office. Therefore the correct
answer to this is:
The title of ABC motors would be “Void”
<span>This is considered right away as Void since there was no
information or any knowledge on the part of ABC motors about the stolen car. </span>
The sale and purchase of government securities by the Fed would leave reserves unchanged.
<h3>
What is the effect of the purchase and sale of government securities?</h3>
The Fed is the Central Bank of the United States. One of the duties of the Fed is to conduct monetary policies. Monetary polices are used to affect the level of money supply in the economy.
One of the monetary policy tools of the Fed is open market operation. When the Fed sells government securities, it is known as an open market sales which reduce money supply. When the Fed buys government securities, it is known as an open market purchase which increases money supply.
Reserve ratio is the percentage of deposits that is required of commercial banks to keep as reserves. Reserve ratio is determined by the Fed.
Change in reserve = ( value of government securities bought / reserve ratio) - (value of government securities sold / reserve ratio)
($500 / 0.2) - (500 / 0.2) = 0
To learn more about reserve ratio, please check: brainly.com/question/6831267
#SPJ1
False, while the supply of major film stars is small and relatively fixed in the short run, the demand for the average doctor or nurse is quite large globally. By stating that the marginal benefit of services provided by doctors and nurses is considerably lower than the marginal benefit of services provided by major film stars, the diamond-water paradox is illustrated. This suggests that while there is a greater demand than there is for major film stars, there is a greater supply of doctors and nurses.
The marginal utility that major movie stars provide to moviegoers is greater than the marginal utility that patients receive from doctors and nurses. This is due to the fact that people who use the services of well-known actors and actresses are more willing to pay for them than people who use the services of physicians and nurses. Though a person's health is more important to their quality of life than movies, consumers value movies more for their utility than their health, especially once they have achieved a basic level of sound health. This actually explains the "diamond water paradox," in which consumers are willing to pay more for valuable diamonds than they are for the water that sustains life. In plain English, people are more willing to value the satisfaction they get from watching one more movie than they are from receiving more medical attention. That implies that people only give basic healthcare needs a thought.
Note that the full question is:
Movie stars such as Salma Hayek, Samuel L. Jackson, Dwayne Johnson, and Jennifer Lawrence are paid millions of dollars per movie, which can take as much as 6 months of full-time work for an actor. By contrast, doctors and nurses earn considerably less over the same time period. Why might this be? While the supply of (major film stars OR doctors and nurses) is small and relatively fixed in the short run, the demand for (the average doctor or nurse OR movies featuring these film stars) is quite large globally. By contrast, the marginal benefit of the services provided by (major film stars OR doctors and nurses) is relatively low, although the total benefit is quite high. This illustrates the diamond-water paradox. True or False
Learn more about marginal utility brainly.com/question/15050855
#SPJ4
