1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frutty [35]
3 years ago
5

How was american expansionism overseas similar to previous continental expansion westward, and how was it different? was the tak

ing of hawaii, puerto rico, and the philippines really a violation of fundamental american ideals of self-government and democracy?
History
1 answer:
dimulka [17.4K]3 years ago
7 0

On the continental expansion, Americans pushed Native Americans off their land making deals with them that favored the US more than the tribes. After that, Americans pushed their ideas to the areas being developed trying to make Native Americans abandon their own culture.

On the expansionism overseas the US returned the land to its original inhabitants, this happened in Cuba for example. This was the main difference between expansionism inside and outside the US.

The taking of Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines was a violation of fundamental American ideals of self-government and democracy, this was actually the main argument of Anti-Imperialists. Once the US  had claimed the territory they established their own rule and define role/impact in each respective country. Conquering other territories and forcing them to abide by American ideals and culture goes against the idea of American freedom.

You might be interested in
The Civil War lasted much longer than people expected. How would a longer war affect the home front?
Ahat [919]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

It might make it harder to farm and take care of animals with men off fighting.

Supplies, like food, flour, or candles, might run out.

Fighting might take place in fields, destroying crops.

People might have to do without the things they need.

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

The country suffers from war faces lot of issues like ruining of homes and properties, destroy of crops, shortage of supplies like food, flour and other stuff. People might work without the things they require.

The Civil War hit life on the home front as well as the battleground. Families throughout the North and South suffered deficiencies of supplies, had their fields and homes ruined, or in some situations seized to be practiced for the war effort.  Work of women and children changed in all aspects. For the first time, many women gained authority of farms or properties, served as nurses on and off the battleground, and even challenged in combat. Families were split separate as loved ones were forwarded off to fight.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The starving time was a winter in Jamestown that led the residents to eat what
Varvara68 [4.7K]

Humans!

Recent scientific evidence suggests that during the starving time, the residents of the Jamestown Colony resorted to cannibalism, that is, the eating of dead humans.

Eventually, the growing of tobacco took and Jamestown was able to take hold as a successful colony but during the starving time, Jamestown went from 500 colonists to 60.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the political systems of Southeast Asian kingdoms change from the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries?
faltersainse [42]
During the 16th to 18th century, Southeast Asia was a diverse region in terms of geography and culture. However, most part of it was governed by the Mughal state. In that time, there was a unified system when it comes to currency system, organization of the mint, taxation system, and maintenance of law and order. 

3 0
3 years ago
Which party is more likely to set up a pro-Western government, and why?
daser333 [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

the western faction, because it is closer to the west than the eastern faction.  both the northern faction and the southern faction will probable stay neutral, or split things in half horizontally.

8 0
3 years ago
HELP!! 25 POINTS
mr_godi [17]

Based on Morrison's version of the Hindenburg disaster, it can be said that his version of the event matches what is in the video for the most part. The only difference is the number of people on board.

<h3>Who was Herbert Morrison?</h3><h3 />

He was a reporter that covered the arrival of the Hindenburg to New Jersey and so was there when it caught flames and crashed to the ground, killing 35 people.

Morrison's version of the event were accurate because he saw it happen before his eyes. From the rain to the Hindenburg catching flames and then crashing after falling on its mooring mast.

The only difference is that Morrison thought the number of people on board were 106 when in fact they were 97 people.

Find out more on the Hindenburg Disaster at brainly.com/question/8241950

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who did Hitler blame for Germany's problems?
    6·1 answer
  • The American space mission that was first to land on the moon was?
    5·1 answer
  • For the first time in 16 years, the Presidential Election of 1992 saw
    14·1 answer
  • What is and example of trust busting that theodore roosevelt enforced
    15·1 answer
  • Why did people migrate away from the Sahel around 4,000 years ago
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT one of the ideas behind the Iroquois system of governing?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a dictatorship?<br> le
    7·1 answer
  • Terence V. Powderly, leader of the Knights of Labor, did not oppose strikes.
    8·1 answer
  • identify ONE word that best describes the lives of African Americans during the period of Reconstruction.
    8·1 answer
  • What reason does Tokata Iron Eyes give for joining the group ReZpect Our Water?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!