Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
because FALSE ∧ω∧ ∨ω∨ ∩ω∩ ∪ω∪ ΔωΔ >ω< ∫∅∫
Answer:
The author refers to poetry providing pleasure to those who have read, heard or recited some poetry.
Explanation:
The author also points out in his text that at all times poetry is an alternative form of fun, a way of feeling fully realized, and without poetry we would all be spiritually impoverished. But, to understand this, it is necessary for people to know more deeply what poetry is, since in this aspect people are more concerned with appreciating it than giving it a definition.
Answer:
They would have more leisure time to themselves.
They would have machines laboring for them.
Explanation:
hope this helps :)
Repetition is a useful rhetorical device for political speeches because that lets you know what they are talking about and it proves to you that they want to get their point across and when they use repetition it shows its important
Answer:
The Spanish version is more effective.
Explanation:
Even though both versions are beautiful, in the translated one some figures of speech are lost, for example, in "venid a ver" there is an ALLITERATION that has a sound effect (the repetition of letter v) in the original language that is not shown in the English version.
Besides, "venid a ver" would be more effective if translated as 'come to see' (literal translation) instead of 'come and see'.
