1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dexar [7]
3 years ago
12

What was the political relationship between the Kingdom of Kush and Egypt?

History
2 answers:
Basile [38]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:B

Rudik [331]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Correct answer is The two nations competed for control over Nubia.

Explanation:

First option is not correct as both countries were independent. Egypt had a lot of dynasties that ruled in the country.

Second option is correct as Kush created an independent country on the soil of Nubia and fought for control with Egypt. They even ruled in Egypt for some period.

Third option is not correct as they were trading a lot for example.

This is not correct as their cultures were quite different and were very often engaged in quarrels.

You might be interested in
World War II ended shortly after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japan. Four years later, the Soviet Union respond
avanturin [10]

Answer:

The United States increased its efforts to construct nuclear weapons.

Explanation:

It was an arms race. The objective of the arms race was to invest in research and the creation of weapons. When the United States launched an armament, the Soviet Union responded with an even more powerful one. At a certain point in this race, both countries would match and realize that they could destroy each other, and the world as well.

5 0
3 years ago
What would be 5 outcome if dinosours werent extinct
Elena-2011 [213]
Hm...
1) we would have to compete with them for food
2) we'd have to run like h    if we saw a predator
3) we'd have much more different cities
4) some inventions might not have been invented
5) some modern species would be extinct, or not exist
3 0
3 years ago
Why was Louis XVI considered ineffectual?
Naddika [18.5K]
Many considered Louis XVI to be ineffectual mainly because of the fact that the revolution had already taken place, and that he was unable to enact any meaningful policies.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is nationalism?
Bas_tet [7]
D because nationalism has bastion
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one of the primary ways Islam’s golden age impact of the European Renaissance
Luba_88 [7]

Islamic scholars preserved some of art and literature’s most classical works, inspiring the Europeans.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the Peloponnesian war begin
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes a shared goal of civil rights leaders Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. DuBois, and Marcus Garvey?
    11·2 answers
  • Do you think all child labor should be banned? Why or why not?
    14·1 answer
  • What was the wartime elections act
    6·2 answers
  • The Ten Commandments are a list of rules for
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the british want to expand control into the Ohio valley in the mid- 1700s?
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone check my work, please?.
    11·1 answer
  • Grant was considered a successful leader because
    9·2 answers
  • Teks<br>Eksposisi<br>Bagian Eksposisi<br>Alas<br>1<br>1.<br>2<br>2.<br>3.<br>3<br>4<br>5<br>E​
    12·1 answer
  • Can someone help me pweaaaaaas​
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!