Answer:Competency to stand trial (CST), according to the Dusky standard, has two basic components to its definition. The first component refers to the accused<u> individual's </u><u>Ability to interact rationally with an attorney</u> The second component refers to the accused individual's <u>understanding how the court process work.</u>
Explanation:
Competency to Stand Trial is a a legal construct that states that an individual or defendant should be able to understand the nature, reason and purpose of a legal proceedings against him and should be able to effectively interact rationally with an attorney or counsel in his defense. Such defendant should be able to understand the type of charges against him or her , the court room and the participants included, also he should be able to cooperate with his attorney by giving details to in terms of facts including reasons and causes of his actions for offence alleged on him or her so as to enable the attorney challenge witnesses on his behalf
Only an individual who does not show a mental disorder or defect can understand this conditions and cooperate with an attorney, In cases where individuals try to feign mental disorder, a Psychological testing is carried out so as to show competency for such individual to stand trial .
Answer:
All of these are part of the process except the Supreme Court. The Judicial Branch of the government is not involved in the budgetary process
Explanation:
cuz im smart :)
The process of labeling an individual as deviant is called a degradation ceremony.
The letter A is the one that represents a neurotransmitter acting via direct effects.
<h3>What is a neurotransmitter?</h3>
These are chemical messenger that helps carries signals across the neurons and target cells throughout the body.
Hence, the letter A represents a neurotransmitter acting via direct effects because its involves direct connection between the neurons.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about neurotransmitter
<em>brainly.com/question/26387085</em>
The answer to your question is True. The supreme court can rule certain laws unconstitutional through cases.
