The correct answer is:
Marxism.
Explanation:
A command economy, also known as planned economy is an economic system where the government controls the production, the government decides how, when and how much to produce, as well as the price of the products, the supply and demand laws doesn't interfere in this type of economy.
A command economy can be considered a base in Marxism, because in the "Common Manifesto" written by Karl Max, he states that the state should control the production, communication, transportation and that there should only be one national bank, owned by the state; and that is the basic principle of a command economy.
For Karl Marx, conflicts in a society are mostly caused by capitalist societies with different class status, where the proletariat class works a big amount of hours to produce products and services, and the upper class doesn't care about them.
<em>The Marxism theory states that this class conflict leads to a proletarian revolution, which then results in socialism, who will later transform in communism. </em>
The correct option is (C) A strong central government. It was part of the first draft of the Articles of Confederation submitted to the Second Continental Congress but not in the final version?
What was the Articles of Confederation?
The Continental Congress received the first draft of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were enacted by the Continental Congress on November 15, 1777. The Articles of Confederation were presented to the states on November 17, 1777, along with a request for urgent action.
A stronger federal government was soon required, which prompted the Constitutional Convention in 1787. On March 4, 1789, the Articles of Confederation were superseded by the current United States Constitution.
To learn more about Articles of Confederation refer to:
brainly.com/question/2023724
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
All of the following options are in effect to ensure the government does not have too much power.
<u>Option I:</u>
Government officials are indeed subject to the law, they're not above it nor are they allowed to break the law without facing repercussions.
<u>Option II:</u>
Government officials are held accountable for their actions which is true. Government officials are at risk to be impeached, which is to be removed from their position if they break any laws.
<u>Option III:</u>
Limitations are placed on how long government officials can serve, which is indeed true. Government officials aren't allowed to serve for long periods of time, they're usually allowed to serve for a few years then a new government official is voted into office.
<u>Option IV:</u>
The government is divided into branches which is again true. This is called separations of powers which was put into place to ensure the government doesn't have all the power. So, the government was spilt into three different branches and checks and balances ensures that each branch doesn't gain more power than the other.
Which means your answer is option D "i., il., iii., and iv" or all of the above.
Hope this helps.
I think answer choice D makes the most sense.
Answer: The Reformation allowed for a critique of authority.
Explanation:
The Reformation can be seen as a product of ideas not imposed by the Renaissance and Humanism. The proclamation of science, art, and freedom contributed to the spread of criticism and free thought. The Reformation is partly the product of these events. For the first time with the Reformation, the man was able to criticize the authorities, i.e., the church, and all the negative phenomena evident in that institution. That is why the Reformation as a movement is extremely important because it has contributed to man's critique and free thought. It was one of the first stages in that process.