It seems that you have missed the necessary options to answer this question, but anyway, this statement is considered FALSE. It is not true that incapacitation <span>relies on future considerations-criminals are punished because of what they may do in the future based on what they did in the past. Hope this answer helps.</span>
The president would need the bill to be read by three different parties such as the Executive branch, the Legislative branch and the Judicial branch. These branches have people in their branches that take readings.
first the bill would be handed off to the first reading where it will be looked at and seen what they need to check for mistakes and the want for the law.
Second reading gets looked at again by another group of people and can be rejected but also be rejected at the first
then third goes to the third reading and is passed on to the governor general to be placed into Royal assent where it is officially a law.
off of this it means women weren't happy with what they had in life they wanted some more...
They basically expected the colonists to have a voice around in their government, since they did have the rights to vote as well as the navigation acts dealt with colonial trade, which wasn't much about the rights, their isn't any so-called monarchy too.
- Sincerely, Ouma
Answer:
They do not support the PATRIOT act
Explanation:
Think of it like this:
If you had a friend who was doing something that you would consider bad, or just outright wrong. You would speak out and let them know, "Hey! Don't do that!" But they make you be quiet, or else, you would (for some apparent reason) get in trouble for speaking out against them.
