The correct answer is B. It focuses on facts about mush without including Douglass's own opinion of it.
Explanation:
In this excerpt, Douglass provides information about the way children and adults were feed as they were all slaves. Moreover, in this text, Douglass mainly describes the food called "mush" and the way this was provided without including his opinion or feelings about this. This can be seen in ideas such as "was coarse corn-meal boiled" or "set down upon the ground". This characteristic makes the text to be objective as there is a focus on facts and the personal opinion of the author is not included. According to this, the correct answer is B.
Two adjectives that could be used to describe Winston Churchill's May 1940 speech are determination and courage. The determination is to resist oppression no matter how much "blood, toil, tears and sweat" is required and also where he says " I say it is to wage war by land, sea and air". Re courage, it is exemplified where he says, "It is victory-victory in spite of all terrors".
Weedon Scott almost killed the White Fang because <span>C.</span>
<span>Weedon Scott is afraid White Fang will hurt his family.</span>
Answer:
I absolutely want to live forever, and I wish every person I love felt the same way.
Explanation:
1. A paradoxical slowing of the population growth rate because people who live longer start having children later, enough later dampen the exponential effect of having children far more than the linear affect of not dying adds to the population.
2. Vast increase in productivity and wealth. Right now we have to acquire excess over our 40 productive years so we can survive our 20 declining ones. Imagine not having to store away the excess, not to be in the 20 year expensive declining phase. Huge free up in economics.
3. Right now war remains a reasonable choice when the risk is only 30 or so productive years of life. When it's 100s of productive years, few will want to take that risk.
I understand why others don't want to live forever. They have been conditioned to see it as hubris, as tied to evil, and as somehow a tradeoff against humanity. But these were stories. If you go back in your past and examine the stories you'll realize they were done by people with little interest in really understanding how these things would play out, just an interest in getting you scared enough to buy the book or movie ticket.
So we can learn and understand the culture of what Shakespeare wrote centuries ago