1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
max2010maxim [7]
3 years ago
6

Explain why legally obtained evidence cannot he used in court.

History
2 answers:
sleet_krkn [62]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Because it may violate the defendant's constitutional rights.

Explanation:

In the United States, the exclusionary rule is a legal rule, based on constitutional law, that prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights from being used in a court of law.

kotykmax [81]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:  In the United States, the exclusionary rule is a legal rule, based on constitutional law, that prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights from being used in a court of law.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why did the League of Nations want to keep peace after the first war
Effectus [21]

Answer: a way to solve disputes between countries before they erupted into open warfare.

Explanation: a way to keep piece before war

6 0
2 years ago
Everyone is aware of Paul Revere and how he rode through town announcing the arrival of the British. How important was communica
FinnZ [79.3K]
Communication was very important because back than they didn't have phones and T.V.s so they had to let people know of the danger soon 
6 0
3 years ago
How do we determine that decisions we make it’s “rational”
loris [4]

Rational decision making is a multi-step process for making choices between alternatives. The process of rational decision making favors logic, objectivity, and analysis over subjectivity and insight. The word “rational” in this context does not mean sane or clear-headed as it does in the colloquial sense.

hope this helps


6 0
3 years ago
What us action in 1941 angered the Japanese and resulted on the bombing of Pearl harbor
DaniilM [7]
I looked this up

Japan's only chance was the element of surprise and to destroy America's navy as quickly as possible. Japan wanted to move into the Dutch East Indies and Malaya to conquer territories that could provide important natural resources such as oil and rubber.

War between Japan and the United States had been a possibility that each nation's military forces planned for in the 1920s, though real tension did not begin until the 1931 invasion of Manchuria by Japan.

Hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
What areas during the 1890 and 1920 in American needed reform?
slava [35]
I would say government and rights of the public to decide whether we should war or not.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the trade in african slaves increase dramatically in the seventh century?
    10·1 answer
  • How does king respond to the "call for negotiation"? What reasoning does king offer to support his counterargument
    13·1 answer
  • What was the end result of the vietnam war
    8·1 answer
  • I don’t know :(( someone help pls
    11·1 answer
  • What is the name of the family famous for their paleoanthropology work? ​
    14·1 answer
  • What is a signed agreement
    13·1 answer
  • I need help with this question
    13·1 answer
  • I need help with the Salem witch trials.
    9·1 answer
  • Democracy Denied
    14·1 answer
  • A provision of the us netuarly act of 1985
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!