1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fed [463]
3 years ago
15

According to "Quiet Resistance," why didn't more Jews leave Europe when Hitler began issuing unjust laws?

History
1 answer:
Vlad [161]3 years ago
5 0
I think it’s C
hope it helps!
You might be interested in
Explain how and why imperialism and the alliance system both contribute to the outbreak of ww1
Deffense [45]
The tensions from European Imperialism did not only cause the entanglement of alliances, but lead to countries strengthening their military. ... In European nations like Germany, nationalism was driven by imperialism. Nations like Britain and Germany were expanding and thought they were unstoppable.

The other alliance was the Triple Entente. This included Soviet Union (Russia), Great Britain, and France. The danger of these alliances is that if a member from one alliance declared waron a member from the other alliance, the conflict would quickly escalate. That is what happened in World War I.
5 0
3 years ago
Explain how violence played a role in opposing religious views and conflicts during the 1500's
rusak2 [61]

Answer:

. . .

Explanation:

The statement attributed to Jesus "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword" has been interpreted by some as a call to arms for Christians. Mark Juergensmeyer argues that "despite its central tenets of love and peace, Christianity—like most traditions—has always had a violent side. The bloody history of the tradition has provided disturbing images and violent conflict is vividly portrayed in the Bible. This history and these biblical images have provided the raw material for theologically justifying the violence of contemporary Christian groups. For example, attacks on abortion clinics have been viewed not only as assaults on a practice that Christians regard as immoral, but also as skirmishes in a grand confrontation between forces of evil and good that has social and political implications. sometimes referred to as Spiritual warfare.

Higher law has been used to justify violence by Christians:(

Historically, according to René Girard, many Christians embraced violence when it became the state religion of the Roman Empire: "Beginning with Constantine, Christianity triumphed at the level of the state and soon began to cloak with its authority persecutions similar to those in which the early Christians were victims.^^

In 1095, at the Council of Clermont, Pope Urban II declared that some wars could be deemed as not only a bellum iustum ("just war" -.-), but could, in certain cases, rise to the level of a bellum sacrum (holy war):) Jill Claster, dean of New York University College of Arts and Science,[40] characterizes this as a "remarkable transformation in the ideology of war", shifting the justification of war from being not only "just" but "spiritually beneficial"D:Thomas Murphy[who?D: ] examined the Christian concept of Holy War, asking "how a culture formally dedicated to fulfilling the injunction to 'love thy neighbor as thyself' could move to a point where it sanctioned the use of violence against the alien both outside and inside society".[citation needed] The religious sanctioning of the concept of "holy war" was a turning point in Christian attitudes towards violence; "Pope Gregory VII made the Holy War possible by drastically altering the attitude of the church towards war... Hitherto a knight could obtain remission of sins only by giving up arms, but Urban invited him to gain forgiveness 'in and through the exercise of his martial skills'." A holy war was defined by the Roman Catholic Church as "war that is not only just, but justifying; that is, a war that confers positive spiritual merit on those who fight in it".

In the 12th century, Bernard of Clairvaux wrote: "'The knight of Christ may strike with confidence and die yet more confidently; for he serves Christ when he strikes, and saves himself when he falls.... When he inflicts death, it is to Christ's profit, and when he suffers death, it is his own gain.

The Roman Inquisition, during the second half of the 16th century, was responsible for prosecuting individuals accused of a wide array of crimes relating to religious doctrine or alternate religious doctrine or alternate religious beliefs. Out of 51,000 — 75,000 cases judged by the Inquisition in Italy after 1542, around 1,250 resulted in a death sentence Violence was ubiquitous in sixteenth and seventeenth- century Europe; its control and suppression are fundamental to the very idea of early modernity. It was during this period that violence was first perceived as a constant feature of the human condition and identified as a major social and political problem, inspiring writers, painters and philosophers to address the issue. Religious division exacerbated civil conflict, but contrary to what one might expect, this period also saw a reduction in interpersonal violence, the use of torture and capital punishment. This module investigates this apparent paradox, using violence to understand the tremendous social, political and religious upheavals of the age, while at the same time exploring the possibilities for peace, co-existence and civility hope this helped :)

4 0
2 years ago
PLS I NEED THIS ASAP
kondor19780726 [428]

The Louisiana Purchase and the Lewis & Clark Expedition  and its “Sea-coasts, or Inland Countries; Course and Junctions of Rivers and First, Jefferson was eager to push western exploration and American claims  It is also questionable how firmly the expedition reinforced the nation's claim to the Oregon territory.

THE answer is C.

7 0
3 years ago
What happened to the kings of Europe after the crusades
statuscvo [17]

Answer:

<h3> </h3><h3>The Crusades provided an outlet for nobles' dreams of glory. Wars of foreign conquest had occurred before the Crusades, as the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 illustrates, but for many knights migration began with the taking the cross. The Crusades introduced some Europeans to Eastern luxury goods, but immediate cultural impact on the West remains debatable. By the late eleventh century strong economic and intellectual ties with the East had already been made.  The Crusades were a boon to Italian merchants, however, who profited from outfitting military expeditions as well as from the opening of new trade routes and the establishment of trading communities in the Crusader states. </h3><h3> </h3><h3>  </h3><h3> </h3><h3>The Crusades proved to be a disaster for Jewish-Christian relations.  In the eleventh century Jews played a major role in the international trade between the Muslim Middle East and the West. Jews also lent money to peasants, townspeople, and nobles. When the First Crusade was launched, many poor knights had to borrow from Jews to equip themselves for the expedition.  Debt bred resentment. Hostility to Jews was then enhanced by Christian beliefs that they engaged in the ritual murder of Christians to use their blood in religious rituals. Such accusations led to the killing of Jewish families and sometimes entire Jewish communities, sometimes by burning people in the synagogue or Jewish section of town. </h3><h3> </h3><h3> </h3><h3>Legal restrictions on Jews gradually increased. Jews were forbidden to have Christian servants or employees, to hold public office, to appear in public on Christian holy sites, or to enter Christian parts of town without a badge marking them as Jews. </h3><h3> </h3><h3> </h3><h3>The Crusades also left an inheritance of deep bitterness in Christian-Muslim relations. Each side dehumanized the other, viewing those who followed the other religions as unbelievers. Whereas Europeans perceived the Crusades as sacred religious movements, Muslims saw them as expansionist and imperialistic. The ideal sacred mission to conquer or convert Muslim peoples entered Europeans’ consciousness and became a continuing goal.</h3>

Explanation:

<h3>#hopeithelps</h3><h3>stay safe and keep well</h3><h3 /><h3>mark me as brain liest pls</h3>
8 0
3 years ago
What was a way for a poor person in Europe to have a chance at a better life?
babunello [35]

Answer:

being an indentured servant

Explanation:

The servants were laborers of the great lands commanded by the 'masters' and lived in the vicinity of the property. They were tied to the land for work, had no right to pay or benefits, but worked to live on the spot and received the necessary supplies to feed and survive. For this reason, the way for a poor person in Europe to have a chance at a better life was to become a indentured servant.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following illustrates the concept of equality of opportunity?
    14·2 answers
  • Where was the first Indian boarding school built?
    13·1 answer
  • What German act violated the Munich agreement
    14·1 answer
  • What did william penn consider his colony to be "fundamental order" a "holy experiment" a "royal church" a "personal estate"?
    11·1 answer
  • DONT ANSWER IF YOU DONT KNOW
    13·1 answer
  • Describe Americans contributions to the Allied war effort
    6·1 answer
  • Who won the election of 1824, and how was the winner determined
    10·2 answers
  • Which one goes into which? need help ASAP!! :)
    7·1 answer
  • How did Felipe Guamán Poma de
    6·1 answer
  • HELP MMEH PLEASE I REALLY NEED YOUR HELP
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!