This is an opinion question, which means there is no wrong answer. Answer it however you would like.
I would say they are more believable if whoever has created the fake story hasn’t included any outrageous and nonrealistic details, since true stories are sometime so unbelievable because of the randomness of them.
These are the correct answers:
1. comforting
2. They give examples from their own lives.
3. Most teachers lose sight of what is best for their students.
4. life
5. proficient speakers of English.
6. The sounds of English have become too familiar to him.
7. their resentment toward their fathers for bad decisions that they made.
8. wondering about the choices she has made and how they have affected her child.
9. give the reader a sense of a sailor’s relationship to water.
10. to help readers understand the speaker’s wistful desire for liberty.
Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
Please answer this I’m so confused
Answer:
Reporting on good deeds may change society’s expectations about performing them.
Explanation:
"Putting Good Deeds in Headlines May Not Be So Good" is an article written by Tovia Smith. In his report, Smith says that when good deeds are publicized, one dimishes the value of being good or doing good deeds. While interviewing an expert, the expert said to Smith that when the good deeds, which should be an ordinary norm, is portrayed as extraordinary, it brings moral inflation. Performing good deeds should not be made an extraordinary thing as it poses the danger of creating expectations of not doing good.
People should perform good deeds as a normal standard, as a human being, and not to get a celebrity treatment.
Thus, the central idea of the article is that reporting about good deeds pose the threat of changing society's view on performing them as well.
Trevor’s gardening position
